A different approach to Income Tax

Please note, this article will be updated as things happen with regard to this matter. New developments will be posted at the end. There is a possibility that this information will be removed in the future, so if this is something you like to have access to, I suggest you copy the text and save it in a file of your own.

GREAT NEWS!  Although I have not had any written confirmation from anyone working for HMRC that they cannot point out any fault in what I describe below, they did not charge income tax for the years that I have now used this method of filling out the tax return, and have refunded money above what I owed them. See the last update for exactly how this happened.

I just filed the income tax return for my legal person
MR KENT BENGTSSON.

In doing so, I deducted all expenses I could prove by way of receipts, account statements or other records of financial transactions in this name. No matter if they were business expenses or "private" expenses.

So this is basically a test of a method I have figured out myself, based on the principle that a man does not stand within the fictions of Law and Government, except by express agreement/contract.
It also supposes that no man (man, as in member of mankind) is a slave today and that therefore  Involuntary Servitude is not lawful.

Since MR KENT BENGTSSON does not exist in the tangible physical reality, but is an entity in the two-dimensional world of "words on paper" (In other words "a fiction") it needs a living man to conduct it's affairs. That living man is me.

And since we do not today practice slavery, no one can be expected to perform work without compensation, unless an expressed agreement to that effect already exists for a given task or period.
Doing everything required of MR KENT BENGTSSON is a fair bit of work. Especially the labour one performs in order to have compensation in the form of money paid to KENT BENGTSSON's accounts.

I am posting this here as a possible outcome of all this could be that the tax man agrees to what I have done or that my person no longer is a tax-payer, on the condition that I do not inform others of what I have done.  So that is why I'm sharing this now, in case I cannot tell later. If this did not work out for some reason, I will of course add what happened and any how and why of relevance. If I in a year or so from now provide no further information, assume it worked out.

There is of course the possibility that my tax return will slip through the system unnoticed and I just get a refund of the taxes deducted, with no challenge to the figures provided. If that is the case I will say so too. Then the year after will have the same filing and we will se what happens then.

The invoice text below is the core of my method, and the basis for me deducting as valid expenses things that are listed in it. If challenged I may provide more documents to make my point and require that they disprove my assumptions.

The reason I am doing this, is so that people who have salaries or do work where the employer or customer of a contractor have to deduct tax at source, have a way of getting these taxes back.

This should not be interpreted as a tax dodge. I do not mind paying for essential public services. But I do mind paying for a bloated public service who's first and foremost purpose seems to be to waste mine and your money, or worse, to use these money to control, manipulate and restrict us. Not to mention lining the pockets of politicians and public "servants".

If you decide to try this too, you are of course doing that of your own accord and entirely at your own risk. I can make no guarantees as to a successful outcome. There may be many factors that affect the outcome of this, and I may not have mentioned them.

INVOICE

This invoice is for services provided by

the man who goes by the name kent, of the

bengtsson family.

The entity the services have been provided for

is the legal person, MR KENT E. BENGTSSON.

As Involuntary Servitude is not practiced in today's

world, no one can be obliged to perform work without

compensation.

As MR KENT E. BENGTSSON appears to be a dead fictional

creation with no presence in the tangible world of the physical

universe, it cannot perform any physical action, and need

the services of a man who is present in the physical realm

to do any actions for it.

As the UNITED KINGDOM is also such a fictional creation

and as most business transactions are conducted through the

entities of this fictional realm, which appear to mirror the

tangible universe, but in truth are not the same and is of a

lesser order than the real and tangible, this invoice has been

created to express the debt of MR KENT E. BENGTSSON

and the settlement of same.

Date 19 October 2019

Covering services provided from 5 April 2018 until 4 April 2019.

Services provided for MR KENT E. BENGTSSON:

Acting on behalf of MR KENT E. BENGTSSON (here-in-after referred to as KENT) with regard to answering any correspondence, filling out any forms, keeping track of and filing of receipts, bills, invoices and other records, settling any monetary demands that appear to be valid, speaking on behalf of KENT and moving money for KENT when need arise.

Performing physical labour, creative thinking, operating of machinery and tools when working, as KENT, for other legal persons within the UNITED KINGDOM, such as the firm KASK.

Acting for KENT in the capacity of Landlord, with regard to administrative and physical actions required for the renting out of the house and garden referred to as 20 Bricklands, Crawley Down.

Performing any needed administrative, fiduciary and physical actions for KENT as the “Keeper” of any vehicles registered by KENT.

Setting the record straight, when various commercial entities within the UNITED KINGDOM address KENT mistakenly regarding actions or inactions done by undersigned in the capacity of man, and attempting to place these actions within the UNITED KINGDOM and charge KENT penalties for such. Examples: Contraventions of internal policies of the UNITED KINGDOM, where no man, woman or child were harmed or endangered.

Payment required for above services:Since undersigned, as a living man, has no use of money or credit, per se, this invoice will not be requiring any form of monetary units as payment, but rather things that a man may need. Undersigned believes that all forms of money in common use today, are fictional in nature and only “re-presents” the real value in the realm of the living and the tangible, and that invoicing in a designated monetary amount would be mixing reality and fiction.

These are the things required as payment for the services provided:

Food
Drink
Nutritional supplements

Clothing

Haircuts

Medicines

Glasses

Transport including any costs for, or connected to cars, or other means of transport.

Telephone services

Internet connection

Books, magazines and any other publications.

Any services of my fellow men and women, that undersigned may require.
Equipment for sports, exercise and leisure activities.

Travel.

Holidays.
Computer, laptop, printers and other hardware and software for these.
Office supplies.

Housing, including servicing of any mortgage.
Car rental

Household goods – all items in a household, including decorative such.
Fuel for heating and modes of transport.

Dental and Health services.

Gifts and presents to family and friends.

Entertainment.

Tools and machinery.

Building materials.

Storage of produced value, by means of monetary units in KENT's accounts, for future needs.

Food, supplements and healthcare for pets.

Anything else that may be needed or desired in undersigned's life, that can be had by monetary payments.

All definitions of any words used in this invoice, are in according with the understanding of undersigned. When a conflict between definitions between undersigned and definitions used within the UNITED KINGDOM, undersigned's definitions prevail.

Settlement of this invoice:

All items, services, et cetera in the list above acquired by the monetary units paid to KENT for the actions, labour or activities of undersigned in the tangible world, returning the value to it's source and balancing the books in the realm of fiction.

Attached or enclosed evidence of this exchange is proof of settlement.

Autographed by:                                                                  Date:

the man that goes by the name of kent, who is of the bengtsson family line and who stands in the tangible world, unfettered by any man made fictions – except by express recorded agreements and contracts. The one with the paramount interest in the legal person MR KENT E. BENGTSSON.

- - - - - - - -

For a more complete view on taxation as practiced today and suggestions on how to pay less check out the page on "Tax" in the tabs at the top of the page.

All the best

Kent


PS. I just filed the figures according to this invoice and my receipts (which had £6000 unaccounted for due to lost receipts) for the year 2018 - 19, and had the tax deductions returned to my Persons Account minus National Insurance contributions.

I had kind of hoped for them to query my figures, but it did not happen this year. Next year I will have more complete invoices and there will be very little of the income that is not matched by receipts, bills, etc. So maybe the challenge comes then. Or maybe they read my Facebook and blog writings and decided not to challenge me, so there is no case tried that others can refer to if they would like to give this a go. Who knows.

[ I did the following years tax return the same way. This time they did not send a refund and when I later contacted them they said they had questions, and that I would be contacted regarding these. This was at the height of Covid and nothing happened. I keep nudging them and in 2021 they suddenly want account statements, etc.  Turns out they had changed my tax number but I had not forwarded this to the firm I did work for. So I provided the data and again asked about the questions they said they had about the 19/20 tax return. But still no addressing of this matter at all. ]

APPENDIX 1:

If you are looking for other ways of dealing with the Tax Man in the UK or in other countries, you may find methods that suits you better in the page on Tax in the tabs above, toward the end.

I would also recommend this free course by Brandon Joe Williams in California.
https://onestupidfuck.com/contractkillercourse?

You can also join this UK facebook group, where you may find help and tips.

  https://www.facebook.com/groups/1596491153856251

This might be a better idea than what I have done above. But as with anything like this, make sure you are ready for this fight and can stand your ground. So rather spend some time studying what this blog has to offer, as well as what others have to offer, before you go up agains the Tax Man.

Imagine though how much better off you would be if you did not have to say godbye to a large part of the money you get in exchange for your labour. Is that not worth some of your time now, for a great benefit later.

CONTINUATION OF THE STORY

So far no office that I have been in touch with within the HMRC (His Magesty's Revenue and Customs UK) has addressed my invoice to my legal person or any of this. When I complained about not getting an answer I got a letter from the complaints department who "investigated the complaint".

However the lady in the complaints dept. did me the favour of mentioning the legal office's name.
So I wrote them in March 2024.  No response. They were given 30 days to respond.

I I have now written them a second time, giving them another opportunity to respond to the points I have raised. That is being mailed tomorrow.

I included both the previous letter they never responded to and a separate Notice in case they do not respond again, as I can then carry on a three step notice process, until I have an administrative judgement in my favour, which I may use to take to small claims court in order to get back money paid in to HMRC by the people I have worked for.

I will not bore you with all the letters back and forth, but have copied the notice below, in case someone is interested to see what I have done.

NOTE!!  It is only included here as a record of what I have done. If you decide to do something like that, you do so fully under your own responsibility. Do not come asking me for help if it leads into deeper water than you can swim.

Only do what you are comfortable with and which you are willing to suffer the consequences of. If you have dependants who rely on you for support, do not put them in danger by putting yourself in danger.


Here is my notice:

                                                                                                        kent of the family bengtsson, a man.

                                                                                                        c/o

                                                                                                        123 Anystreet

                                                                                                        Anytown

                                                                                                        [postcode]

HMRC Solicitor’s Office & Legal Services                                   31 May 2024

14 Westfield Avenue

Stratford                                                                                             Royal Mail, Signed for #

London E20 1NG                                                                               NV1234 3638 5GB

NOTICE REGARDING

TAX RETURN

To: Whom it may concern,

This notice is being issued as earlier attempts to deal with this matter in a more informal style appears to have been ignored for at least 3 years now, by different offices within the HMRC.

Let me first give a quick background.

I think it was in 2018 that I decided I was not going to work for free to satisfy various demands from the various UK Government offices. Realising it might be hard to get payment from these entities, I came up with an alternative solution. I was going to charge the juristic person/legal entity/Trust/Estate (whatever it is) MR KENT E. BENGTSSON with NI Number QS123456P (here in after, named KENT), for acting in it’s capacity, as and when needed.

I believe this entity was created in order to give me the ability to do business through the realm of fictions, that we humans have created to facilitate almost all trade and interactions we engage in these days.

Such fictions would be for example be THE UNITED KINGDOM and other commercial nations around the world, banks, corporations, associations, Trusts, etc. etc. These not having any presence in the tangible physical reality, but all being a product of the minds of man.

The living and the tangible, not being fictional, are of course of a higher order than the fictions it created. Also, as the Creator are superior to it’s Creations, and Governments, laws, rules, statutes, money, credits, bonds, etc. etc. are all dreamed up by people, they can only be enforced if consented to first. What further confirms this is that Involuntary Servitude is not lawful any more.

A new way of doing the Tax Return.

So, as we no longer practice Involuntary Servitude (slavery), every man must own him-/herself and his and her time and labour. From this follows that all interactions must be under consent and voluntary.

I am not aware of ever having entered into any express contract or agreement, as a living man of the tangible universe, or in the capacity of KENT, to be subject to the internal rules of THE UNITED KINGDOM, or to work for free for these fictions. In case any past actions of mine has been construed to constitute such agreements, that was a mistake bourne out of ignorance.

I hereby cancel any and all such assumed, presumed or construed agreements and apologise for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused.

To my defence I must point out that at no time has representatives for the various branches of THE UNITED KINGDOM, come to me and laid the cards on the table and negotiated an express agreement signed by both parties and witnessed.

Now, in case KENT is somehow bound to obey the internal regulations of THE UNITED KINGDOM, and since KENT appears to be a dead legal fiction, it needs a living thinking man to enter into the capacity of this deal legal fiction, when required for things that cannot be done in the tangible reality – such as most commercial transactions and handling of money and credits. As the main beneficiary of KENT, I have done this, and since I am not a slave, I can demand compensation for this work.

Thus I invoiced KENT for my services with the invoice in Attachment 1. as explained in correspondence with Complex and Agents and Customer Compliance Complaints, who were asked to forward the matter to the HMRC legal office to be dealt with. This seem to never have happened and I have not had one word back in response to my new way of doing the tax return for KENT. Hence this notice and formal process.

I made clear to the people in both offices above that I would not file another tax return until this matter is fully resolved, so I guess it is in your interest to sort this out with me.

I furthermore pointed out that I am not a graduate of Law School, thus I am not qualified to interpret the Income Tax Act. So as I understand that, I am not allowed to ever TRY to understand any Act of Parliament. Since I cannot comply with something I cannot understand, I cannot guarantee that I will fill out a Tax Return in the correct way, and therefore I need a letter from a person in your organization that is authorised to indemnify me from any and all mistakes I may make in filling out your Tax Return, due to my inability to truly know what the Income Tax Act is saying.

Here are some portions of my letter to Small Business Compliance, Complex and Agents, of 6 November 2022 (see how long it has been and yet no substantial answer to the points raised) so as to avoid typing it all again. Apologies if this does not flow perfectly with the text above:

To get a grasp of where I come from and the angle I have taken in this matter, please read these attachments:

1. The invoice from me to KENT.

2. “Fiction of law” and “Fiction” definitions. This seems to make the confession that man made law is not real, but a fiction/make believe.

3. Quotes from old US court cases. Whether this is actual or fake, it illustrates well the idea that the tangible and fictions are two separate things.

4. Copy of Declaration of Identity – Kent of the Bengtsson family.

5. Definition of Capacity.

OK, lets have a look at this then. It is my understanding that:

The Crown Corporation of the City of London, the UK Government and all their subsidiaries have been dreamt up of men like you and me and only exist in thoughts and on paper (which are written down thoughts or agreements) and have no presence in the tangible universe (if you think they are physical or real, please give me how much they weigh, their size, temperature, location and density). Thus they are fictions (of Law).

I as a man (see declaration of identity) am part of the natural and tangible world and thus of a higher order than the man made fictions. As such I can enter into a role within the realm of fictions and act in the capacity of a specific fiction (usually for an agreed upon time and compensation, just like you who read this are now acting in the capacity of a fictitious role/office within the larger fiction of HMRC) and are getting paid to do so.

Since the government is a fiction it cannot see or interact with the real and tangible, it cannot “concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them”.

Thus it created a corporate or juristic person with which it CAN interact and which re-presents the man in the realm of fiction. This would in my case be the Resident/Taxpayer/Driver/et cetera MR KENT BENGTSSON which has assigned to it the NI number QS123456P. I understand it is not a living man, but a dead corporate fiction/juristic person. It cannot do anything on its own, and need a living man to act as it when the need arises. That would be undersigned.

I furthermore understand that Involuntary Servitude is no longer practised in this society as well as the other nations of this Earth. Thus all servitude has to be voluntary and per agreement, such as in an Employer - Employee relationship, where someone agrees to under certain scheduled hours serve a boss for an agreed upon compensation in accordance with the employment contract and the regulations in that jurisdiction.

There is no contract that clearly spells out when and where I am to act in the capacity of the corporate/juristic person MR KENT BENGTSSON and what my compensation for doing so is.

That I have done so in the past for free, is due to my ignorance in these matters and the lack of disclosure from the people behind our current system, and may not be interpreted as willing and informed servitude or agreement to perform for free. If any action of mine have lead you to believe that I have agreed to such servitude and to do it for free, I apologise for that and hereby declare that that was a mistake and misunderstanding.

Thus:

For the sake of simplicity and convenience for all concerned, I have decided to charge MR KENT BENGTSSON for all the things I do for it. Surely this is a better alternative than charging the different subsidiaries to the Crown or the Government for whenever I perform things for that entity, and it also takes care of work I do directly for MR KENT BENGTSSON, that does not involve other entities.

Since I am a living flesh, blood and spirit, man. I do not need the fictional money that is used to conduct business between corporate/legal fictions. As a living man I need things like food, shelter, transport, communication, etc.

Thus I have invoiced MR KENT BENGTSSON for all the things I do for it, and it pays for the physical things I need or require. That way I am paid with barter and MR KENT BENGTSSON stays in fiction land with it’s fictional money.

This of course makes all the things I as a man need or require, a legitimate business expense for MR KENT BENGTSSON, and the receipts for all these things is proof of payment of the invoice from the man to the fiction.

Please see Attachment 1, the invoice from the man to MR KENT BENGTSSON for further details.

This most likely brings MR KENT BENGTSSON’S income below the tax threshold. And thus the figures in the 19/20 tax return seem to be wrong. But take attachment 1 into account, and it should all make sense. But MR KENT BENGTSSON still pays many other taxes, such as VAT, fuel duties, tolls, environmental charges, etc. etc. so you still get some money.

In conclusion:

As I see it, the way I am charging MR KENT BENGTSSON for my services, brings it below the income tax threshold and if every receipt, invoice and proof of payment was filed, there would be zero income for MR KENT BENGTSSON.

If the people versed in the law in HMRC can point out a flaw in my reasoning here, using only easily verifiable physical facts and logic (no fictions) please present what you have. If these makes sense or are irrefutable from a viewpoint of pure logic and indisputable facts, and prove that I am a slave or for some other reason have a duty to perform work for the Government for free, I will be happy to revise MR KENT BENGTSSON’S tax return for 19/20 and do the 20/21 within 6 months and after that do the following years.

You have 30 days to respond in substance and prove me wrong. If for some reason you need more time, you may appeal for more time. If you do not respond, it will be considered in accordance with the maxim of law that says that “He who remains silent, agrees”.
Since this is the second presentment of this matter to SOLS, you are already in default and by your silence have agreed that my presumptions above are correct and that I have done no wrong. But as I mentioned in my cover letter, if your failure to respond was due to some internal mistake or slip up, I hereby give you a second chance to set things right.

If you cannot show how I am wrong above or if you chose to remain silent, you agree to return any and all deductions from invoices of KENT that has been sent to HMRC under the CIS scheme, minus NI contributions, to the bank account of KENT. If that is the case, then I see little reason to fill out and submit any more tax returns for KENT, but if you can give me a compelling reason for doing so, I will.

All claims made by any man or woman holding a position within HMRC, regarding this need to be made under that persons full private commercial unlimited liability, taking full responsibility for what is claimed or said and any potential consequences thereof.

The respondent need to give his/her full name and sign with a wet ink signature or autograph. Anonymous replies will be considered a “no reply”.

I hope we can find an amicable solution to this.

Sincerely and in peace

Signed under my unlimited liability as a man.

kent of the bengtsson family, a man.

Settlor and Main Beneficiary of MR KENT BENGTSSON

--------------------------------

As for the attachments, you have the invoice further up in this article.
You have my declaraton of Identity in the article "Make your own ID".

The old quote from US court cases:

a. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction,
and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other
artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The
legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law,
agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."* S.C.R.
1795, **Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.
54;* and,
 
b. "the contracts between them" involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as
Corporate Entities:
 
c. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union,
are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an
"individual entity"",* Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed.
1143, 56 S.Ct. 773

Fiction of Law:

The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing a quality which is not natural to it, and consequently establishes, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribes or authorizes. It differs from presumption because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true.

The law never feigns what is impossible. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it. It aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which does not exist; but it will never feign that what was impossible actually is.

Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it under the pretence of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench.

It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require.

CAPACITY:

7. COUNTABLE NOUN [in NOUN]

If you do something in a particular capacity, you do it as part of a particular job or duty, or because you are representing a particular organization or person.

[written]

She visited the Philippines in her capacity as a Special Representative of Unicef. [+ as] 

This article is written in a personal capacity. 

Morley served in many capacities: as a critic, director, notable biographer and broadcaster. 

That is all for now.  I will update if and when there are more to report.

Update 30 September 2024:

I just got some letters from HMRC regarding the 3 years of Tax returns I turned in, in August 2024.

I did these tax returns in accordance with above method and I attached the paperwork of my invoice from me to my legal person as well as copies of earlier letters where I explained my exact reasoning as per the notice above.

When I first looked at the statements that accompanied the letters, it looked like they had deducted taxes for the year 20/21 and  21/22, but not for the year 22/23 where the full amount of taxes prepaid was marked as overpaid.

But when I sat down and gave it a good read today, I noticed that the money they had deducted was not income tax, but was the "Covid Lockdown Subsidies" I had received in the two first years and the penalty for falesly claiming these subsidies.  These subsidies were 80% of a sole traders average income.

But now when I, through using the above method, declared zero taxable income for those years, they can claim that "if you had no income, then you should not have gotten any subsidies, as that was based on your income. So therefore we will consider these subsidies as not applicable and will take them back from what you have paid in in the form of tax deducted from your invoices to the builder you have been sub-contracting for, as well as the penalties for the false claim".

I am not going to contest that. This is a game, and fair play to them for coming up with this as one way of getting back at me and not having to pay out much in tax returns. Also those subsidies where very wellcome when during the lockdown, I had almost no work and earnings.

But the main thing here is that they DID NOT challenge my way of doing the tax returns and for the last year marked the full amount that had been prepaid by the building firm, as "income tax overpaid".

This is a victory.

As for me asking them to show me a deficiency in my reasoning and the way I am doing my tax return, they are still very silent.  So I will carry on my notices until I have a private administrative judgement in the matter. I do not think they will ever challenge me or respond in a meaningful way to this - but one never knows. If they do, then I will deal with that, as and when.

Was this what I had hoped for?

Yes and No.    I had hoped for a confession by the legal Eagles at HMRC that I was right and that they had no valid objection to it and that I could show that to others who have their taxes deducted at source so that they had a way of getting those taxes back. This has not happened and I now very much doubt that it will. Still anyone who wants to do what I have done here, is free to try this for themselves. I take no responsibility for any consequences of such a pursuit.

I had also hoped that if that did not happen, that a representative of the HMRC would contact me to make a deal for my silence. That has not happened so far.

But that does not take away from the fact that at this writing they have honoured my accounting and kind of acknowledged that I am not a slave and that the legal person/tax payer MR KENT BENGTSSON is a separate fictional entity and that one cannot be forced to do work for it without compensation.

I do not know about you, but to me that is a big win.


I have shared this here so that others that would like to give this a go, can see what I have done. I do not expect a lot of people to do so. I am not some high profile character with thousands of followers and I am not interested in becoming some front figure trying to bring down a corrupt and parasitic system.
I write what I write in the hope that some people will realize they own themselves and that they are not a cog in a machine, but something far more divine and valuable.

Let me finish with the very clever logic of Larken Rose, who I have a lot of respect for.

House Occupation

This is a story from an English freedom seeker. This happened som year ago. I cannot say that I agree with taking an empty house without first making sure that no one claims ownership to it.

But I love the way this guy deals with the police.

Pay attention to what he says and does. I believe this is a very good strategy to be left alone.

Greg's story:

Our housemate, having lived with us for a while now has reached the point where he wants to exercise his right to freely use the fruits of the Earth, in this case an abandoned property. We recently found such a property and yesterday went to seize it to his continued use. Once inside, the door was secured and the following notice placed in the front window :

Notice of action taken by a man

Be informed that I, a man, have found real property (land) at xxxxx unused and abandoned.

As of 5^th June 2011 I have seized it to my continued use and have bestowed bodily labour upon it.

In peace

Your Friend

Within approximately 20 minutes of doing so the next door neighbour came to check what was going on – a truthful answer was given. Very put out and angry by this notion, the threats begin and the police are called.

Not more than three minutes later two cars carrying four police officers arrived. Very angry at first, tasers at the ready, we opened the door and welcomed them in. We explained what we were doing and, when asked, explained the foundational law upon which the process was based.

We were laughing and joking with them so after only a couple of minutes we were having a very friendly discussion with the sergeant who I have to say was a genuinely decent man, as were the other officers once they had been calmed down.

When asked for names, we provided a name with the caveat that the name was to be used for their benefit being careful not to attach ourselves to it and adding that HMCS  (Her Magesty's Court Service) had already acknowledged that I was not the liable party for that name. We were arrested for causing criminal damage (we had actually deconstructed the front door so no damage had been caused, not that that really matters) and one of the officers was trying very hard to make it clear that “the laws of England and Wales apply to everyone, including me and most definitely including you, you are not above the law.” To which the response was “you are mistaken.”

We had a good chat in the van on the way to the custody suite and both committed ourselves to having a fantastic day “we are precisely where we are meant to be. This is our purpose.”

The two other officers who transported us, were waiting with us for about 15 minutes whilst we waited to be booked in. Again they were two decent people. The woman officer was trying to make small talk regarding issues of jurisdiction etc so we politely changed the small talk to the weather and life in general.

On booking in all the usual information was requested and I was once again happy to provide the basics for their benefit only, and with the appropriate caveat. Any other questions were unanswered on the basis that I didn’t recognise the authority of the one asking them. All requests for signature were dealt with by stating “I am unable to sign as it is against my faith,” when asked “what is your faith?” I stated that “it is against my faith to publically talk about my faith.”

The guy who took the fingerprints etc was fantastic, in fact my housemate was convinced that he was his angel for the day. We basically made friends with everyone – love being the order of the day. The next 10 hours we both spent crossed legged in meditation, blessing everyone who had played a part in the day, slowly coming out of meditation every hour when someone put their face through the slot to see how we were. The detention officers were all pretty ok once we had made friends with them. Ten hours of meditation can take you to some strange places – by 7pm the walls of the cell no longer looked solid, and I no doubt looked pretty crazy to anyone watching through the camera when every 20 minutes or so I would break out in hysterical laughter!

At about 9:45pm I was finally interviewed by two of the officers who made the initial arrest. Prior to the official start of the interview I was being asked many probing questions by the young officer, perhaps 27 years old, and it was clear he wasn’t trying to trip me up he was genuinely questioning his role in this saga following what had been said at the house at the time of the arrest. In fact his senior officer had to rein him in. The older officer was clearly the psychology guy, but NLP doesn’t work when you know that’s what the game is! As soon as the tape recorder clicked on everyone got very serious and the interview went as follows:

Officer 1 (older officer): (Introduction – stating time and alleged offences) Are you Mr Gregory Paul Saunders?

Me: Before I respond to any questions you may have today, there is something I need to tell you before we proceed.

Officer 1: What’s that?

Me: (looking deep within his eyes) I love you, (turning to the other officer) I love you (20 seconds of silence)... would you like to repeat the question? (both officers pretty jittery from this point onwards)

Officer 1: erm, are you Mr Gregory Paul Saunders?

Me: in the matter of that name, there has been a mistake. Where is the proper notice so that i can deal with the matter honourably?

Officer 1: we need you to identify yourself for the purpose of this interview.

Me: The only truthful response I can give in relation to my identity is ‘I am’. I need to make it clear at this point that I am unable to answer any further questions.

Officer 1: Why is that?

Me: no comment

Officer 1: I’m not trying to be awkward, would you like the opportunity to explain why you are unable to answer any further questions?

Me: If you were willing to state for the record that in this matter you are speaking to me as my holy brothers then I would take great pleasure in conversing with you as equals. As however you are wearing a uniform and as such appear to be here representing a fictional entity, we are not equal and I am unable to recognise you. I answer only to my creator. For me to answer questions posed by you would also be a blasphemy upon my divine self.

(approximately 30 questions followed relating to the events that had taken place earlier that day, the reply to all of them being “I am unable to answer that question”)

Officer 2: but the laws of this country apply to everyone. No one is above the law. Do you understand that?

Me: Might you be mistaken? (should have been “could it be that I am no one?”)

Officer 1: we believe that you are Mr Saunders and that you did cause criminal damage to xxxx.

Me: Are you using that name for personal identification?

Officer 1: yes, we believe you are Mr Saunders.

Me: Would identifying me by that name without my consent be tantamount to involuntary servitude?

Officer 1: what does that mean?

Me: Are you attempting to enslave me?

Officer 1: oh no. Is there anything else you would like to say before we conclude this interview?

Me: Would you agree that every man has free will?

Officer 1: Yes

Me: It is my will that I leave this detention centre immediately. Will you comply?

Officer 1: Now? Oh no, no

Me: Are you saying man only has free will when it suits you? Would that be tantamount to involuntary servitude?

Officer 1: Is there anything else you would like to say before we conclude this interview?

Me: I am unable to comment any further on this matter.

Tape stopped

Officer 2: So completely off the record, man to man, what got you into all this then?

This question came out of a genuine interest as it was very clear by this point that the days events had had somewhat of an impact on this chap and had made him question his role. We chatted for the next 10 minutes as equals with him expressing a genuine interest in everything from the global matrix of control, to the nature of the banking system, to the desire to create a better world for our children.

Within five minutes of being returned to the cell the case was dropped and I was released with no further action to be taken. My housemate followed five minutes later. When leaving, no signatures were requested, either for the release itself or for the return of chattels.

On the way home we drove past the property that we had been arrested at to find that the door had been left ajar so no attempt was made to prevent a repeat performance which would be without the possibility of arrest for ‘criminal damage.’ Nonetheless, in view of the state of the house, which was unknown beforehand, my housemate has decided to find a different property to use. So we look forward to another adventure!

A massive bingo moment occurred during that day. Whilst I gave what I would have considered the correct responses at all times, it was only during the meditation and subsequently the interview (where I practiced what I had learnt during the meditation) that I fully and completely realised the most basic of truths – Any agency or authority being nothing more than a complete fiction does not deserve the slightest recognition from us as men. This is why we had still not previously been completely left in peace – by engaging with them in any way we ARE acknowledging their authority because any man who truly knows who he is would never sully his own divinity by engaging with, let alone responding to questions posed by, a fictional entity.

Ultimately then we have no business communicating with or attending the place of business of any fictional entity, including the court. Why would anyone who has come to understand that they are far more powerful than any artificial entity, ever go to or communicate with a non-existent entity for any reason, when doing so is acknowledging their very existence and thus their authority?

In the past I have justified such action by expressing intent to help my brothers settle their matters, however there are a couple of issues here – 1. Whilst they are wearing their personas, they are not my brothers no matter how much I treat them as such. 2. If I don’t recognise anything artificial, how could I possibly assist with the settlement of any matter which originates in the fictional realm?

I am not suggesting that the previous processes talked about on this site are obsolete, simply that they only represent a partial truth. Because we tend not to realise the nature of our own enlightenment over night they also remain the ideal stepping stone process along the path of self realisation. For this reason I still highly recommend the court process of correcting a mistake, if not for a complete settlement, for the wonderful opportunity for self growth that the experience provides.

If I were to have yesterdays time again I would simply have stated at the outset, when the police first came to the door of the house, that “it is against my faith to acknowledge you or enter into any form of discussion with you unless you can confirm that you are my holy brother and not a representative of an artificial entity. I refer you to the notice in the front window should you require any information pertaining to our actions today.”



Despite whatever justification the ego may create to deviate from this position, any deviation is in itself an acknowledgement of their authority and a declaration that (at least in some way) we have misunderstood who we truly are. The reason why this may prove a difficult step for many to take (or to even acknowledge it as being the right step) is that it does require significantly more peace of mind and absence of fear, but they that’s what this journey is all about isn’t it? Notwithstanding the above if I were accused of being the name I would still respond with “In the matter of the name there has been a mistake. Where is the proper notice so that I can deal with this matter honourably?” - But nothing more.

Though some minor refinements may be required, I strongly believe that this is the missing piece to the puzzle and represents the complete and final solution to “getting out of the box.” I will start a new forum on this over the next few days.

I love you all, you beautiful people

P.S. When I refer to “my faith” I simply mean the hearts will (or conscience) which receives its instructions directly from my true nature - divine consciousness itself. Whilst “my faith” may conjure a suggestion of ownership, it is simply a way of drawing a line in the sand across which no fictional authority can cross in a manner that the fictional authority can understand. What exactly is meant by “my faith” is not their business.

I asked Greg what the Caveat was and this is the reply:

"Kent - the caveat was "I will provide a name for your benefit only, so long as you understand that it is not to be used to personally identify me" or something to that effect. Having said that, and as you can see from the story, I would not say the same thing again."

------------

This was probably more than 10 years ago now. Greg's site is gone and I have not heard what he does today. He was basically following the "Peaceful Inhabitant" philosophy developed by two Americans calling themselves "Batman and Boris" back then. You can find Batman now as "imbatman57" in Talkshoe ( http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=44889&pageNumber=0&pageSize=15 ) and this appears to be his website:
https://joehuston57.wordpress.com/

As I understand it, the philosophy of Peaceful Inhabitant has it's origin in that these guys studied the Geneva Convention and another similar text, and concluded that the World is under a covert Military Occupation, by the Corporate States and the One World Structures in place.

These conventions says that an occupying force should leave peaceful inhabitants in peace. So if the State is an occupying force that are trying to extort value from, or punish us, they would have no right to do so if we enter into the proper persona and abandon any capacity that they try to place us in - such as the juristic PERSON (The Name in all capital letters).

Greg took this a step further in realizing we should not even interact with the fictions, as this will give them legitimacy as well as degrade our own divine self.  Which he successfully did in the example above.

If you think about it, this could be applied in many situations. But mainly those where you want to be left alone to conduct your own business without interference from a fictional State. Apply this using common sense.

Kent