"You can't know too much - but you sure as hell can know too little."
If you are going to do this, it is pretty likely that you will end up in the Courts we have today. This is the modern battlefield. This is where most battles are fought today. This is where a lot of money is being made by the System and this is where we often find ourselves giving up our rights, possessions and the fruits of our labour.
Below, I will introduce you to different people who you could learn a lot from. They use different approaches and philosophies in their methods. But one for one they have one thing in common. They have a considerable experience of being in a Court Room. Some have done so in practicing law in a conventional way, others have done it as “Freemen”, “Sovereigns”, “Living Men”, “Creditors in Commerce”, or whatever label you like to use for Freedom Seekers.
To become good and to avoid the pitfalls – no matter what subject or skill one tackles, one need to practice. And the harder it is, the more practice one needs. Even if you are a “natural” at something, you need to do some practicing. It is one thing to watch films and videos of ice skating, or read a lot about it. If you know a lot about ice skating, you will most likely learn it faster, than if you never heard about it before. But there is no substitute for putting a pair of skates on your feet and get out on that slippery ice, and fall and fail, until you finally become really good at it.
In this game of taking back our freedom, our rights and our lives, it is no different. We as a group become more and more educated and new strategies and facts surface all the time. And since we do not have our own “Peoples Courts” yet, we are left to fight our battles in writing and if that fails in person in Trials and other Court Hearings. Man's law and rules change too – usually for the worse. So we need to keep tab on those things there, that concern us.
Maybe one day – if we can get rid of the negative or evil influences that now control our way of life and if we can evolve as beings to a mental level where we will cooperate in a spirit of love, rather than fighting each other and compete for things we really do not need, we can have a simpler and more fair life. Maybe doing this freedom seeking now, is a step in that direction.
Treat this page of the blog as a kind of “Course Schedule” or Layout. I suggest you study a bit at the time, instead of just reading through it all in one go and then hopefully going on to pick someone’s teachings and get into that. I have tried to make it flow in a logical sequence – at least the first parts. But if you already are familiar with some of this and some of the suggested “teachers” below, by all means pick and chose.
What will I do with the knowledge I am getting?
Does it align with my purpose in life?
Am I willing to pay the price, in time, in costs and in sacrifices?
How bad do I want it?
Everything has it's price. That price is not always in the form of money. It can be other things you value. So before you decide to dedicate yourself to this you need to be serious about it and willing to put in time and possibly fork out some money on materials that might further your education.
Below you will be presented with different more or less workable approaches. Some of it will be available for free, others will want some donations to share what they have learned the hard way.
But there is one more thing you need to know with regard to self here. You are a co-creator of life and the world we live in. You are not a “cogwheel in a large machine”. You are born equal and with equal rights and freedoms to everyone else on this planet. You have no right to rule other, nor have they any right to rule you – unless you give them that right knowingly and voluntarily.
This is true about your relationship with the system of society we live in too. This system is dreamed up by men like you and I and as living men we stand above our creation. So in relation to all the fictions we people have come up with to make life better or more interesting, we are all in our natural capacity God – when it comes to the fictions of Man. You may say “well I did not come up with the Laws, so how can I be God in relation to them?” You are God in that you allow them to exist. If no one believed in them, they would not be laws. Same with money, contracts, corporations, titles, etc. They exist because we as Man-Gods allow them to exists and matter. If we use them, we show with our actions that we give our consent and our endorsement. It is all voluntary. This “voluntary” part may be hard to see at first, but I promise you that if you keep an open mind and can let go of any hate you might harbour, you will realize this sooner or later.
There is no secret manual about how life works. There is no great “authority” that dictates the “correct” way of doing things. You can create anything you can conceive. Your creator have given you fairly free reigns – a species that abuses that freedom and does not contribute to the general direction of Life itself, will soon be gone from this Earth. Remember this when you start to play with paperwork and courts.
Once you have established a worthwhile purpose, you need to start with the very basics of the subject. This includes things like vocabulary, maxims and basic principles of the subject, some history of the subject.
If something seems very involved or technical. Take some time and draw it up on a sheet of paper or use different objects that represents parts of the whole and set the scene up on a table – a bit like generals at headquarters placing pieces representing troops, weapons and logistics on a map on a table, to get a clearer view of the situation.
Also, and maybe most importantly. If you cannot understand what all the words in a sentence means, you will not fully understand the sentence, nor will you understand the paragraph, the chapter or the book. ALWAYS make sure you know what the words mean. There is no excuse with the internet, that holds both general dictionaries and legal ones. It may also be a good idea to get a few legal dictionaries in book form. That way you can study a book on contract law, Trust law or Administrative law on a plane or a beach somewhere.
Get familiar with the actual physical objects and environments of what you study. If you study how to deal with traffic tickets, spend a morning in Court and see what goes on there as a spectator, in a court room that deals with these.
A good professional never stops learning and observing what others do in his field. I'm in woodwork and construction. When the wife drags me from one clothing shop to another, I look at the shelving, the counter and other furniture in the shop, to see how it is made and what finishes they have used. One can learn lots by just observing.
Practice, practice and practice some more. Put yourself in situations that might force you to use what you are studying. If, for example you need to practice questioning everything, practice on family and friends. Try to do it in such a subtle way that they do not realize you are practicing on them. When we build habits, it gets easier to do things and it becomes second nature.
When I got a speeding or parking ticket, I took it as homework or a practical assignment. When bailiffs came knocking on the door about the unpaid fines, I took it as an exam or test.
It is a bit like the training of a powerful animal like a horse or an elephant. The animal must not realize that it is more powerful than you and must be made so accustomed to becoming commanded and handled, that it stops resisting and willingly does anything it is directed to do – even charge into battle. It is the same with people. If the masses understood that they are being farmed like animals and almost all of the value they produce will be confiscated for the “owners”, this system would fall tomorrow.
We need to get back to that state of mind. Looking at everything with fresh eyes and question anything that does not make sense. Like when a Judge reads the charges, and asks “Do you understand?”, do not just say Yes, so you do not seem dumb. Say “No”. When you are asked what you do not understand, list all the things with the whole matter that does not make sense to you. For example: “If no one was harmed or endangered by the alleged contravention, how can there be a charge? Who makes the charge that I did anything wrong? Where is my accuser? If all men are born equal and no one is another’s master, and I have caused no harm to my fellow man, what gives you the right to make decisions about this matter? What law-form is this court operating in? If the State is the employer of the policeman that issued the ticket, of the prosecutor and of you as a Judge, how is that not a conflict of interest and how can a defendant get a fair trial? Why is the defendants name written as KENT BENGTSSON in the paperwork, and why is the name on the invitation to attend this hearing that was dropped in my letterbox Kent BENGTSSON? What is that about? What does this court seem me as, what capacity have you invited me here in? Etc, etc.
When something does not make sense or conflicts with what you have observed, it probably contains a lie. Use questioning to unearth that lie.
If it's role has not been expressed, and if your role in relation to it has not been expressed a Court or some other public institution may interpret these things in a way that is most beneficial to it.
The Trust is created for one or more parties benefit. These are called “Beneficiaries” or if only one “Beneficiary”.
For example: A wealthy man does not trust that his children will act wisely or responsibly with the money they inherit at his death. So he creates a Trust in which his wealth is placed. He is the Settlor and the Children are the Beneficiaries. He then appoints his accountant or lawyer to be the trustee for the trust. The trustee will then manage the wealth and release a reasonable amount money every year to the children after his death. The trustee is entitled to compensation for work done for the Trust.
If I'm correct in the assumption that the Strawman is a Trust, then your Parents are the Settlors (a role that you will inherit), You and the State are beneficiaries and someone is the Trustee. This Trustee role is a somewhat sticky one, as the Trustee is responsible and has duties.
We have also two classes of Trusts. One is the “Expressed Trust” where it is all written down and laid out clear. The second is the “Constructive Trust”. It should really be called the “Construed Trust”. But the people that run the show like to deceive the public, so will use misleading terms.
The latter is not expressed and the roles can be assumed. The Strawman Trust is such a Trust – until it is expressed. This will allow the State or Courts to assume that you are the Trustee and have the duty to settle any demands upon the Trust – such as fines, taxes, penalties, community service, military service, jury duty, etc.
The way to deal with this is to express the roles in the Trust, so that they are no longer at liberty to construe these as they please.
Right now you will not be knowledgeable enough to fully express the whole Trust, but you can, if it serves you, express the capacity in which you are signing a document.
Therefore: When relevant, qualify in what capacity you are signing a document.This does not have to be trust related. You can also qualify your status in any way you like.
When you create your own paperwork, you can do this any way you see fit, for example:
[ autograph ]
The first part shows how a man avoided paying a penny after a divorce without having a prenuptial agreement in place. Spending time on learning more about trusts, could save you lots of money and grief in the future.
[ videos gets removed, as has the one mentioned above. But the subject has not yet become taboo on YouTube, so do searches on "Private Common Law Trust" or similar terms, there.]
Then specify the status you assume in signing it, or simply just use “by:” before the signature. The “by:” is often used by officers of corporations when signing for the position they hold. This is said to specify that they sign as that fictional entity and do not take any personal responsibility for whatever they confirm with the signature.
If you want to specify the role in the Trust that you take on, sign “by Beneficiary: [signature]” or any other role, such as Settlor or Trustee. Beneficiary would be the safest and most applicable one in most situations, as the Beneficiary have no duties or responsibilities.
Another useful thing one can use when signing others paperwork, is to put “...” before and after the signature. Three dots signifies that something has been omitted. That way one can later clarify what should have been said before the signature and after it – giving you freedom to say exactly what you want to be there, but which you did not have the time or space to specify at the time of signing.
If you sign for a parcel being delivered, it does not matter. But remember to write “not inspected” if you have not inspected the goods being delivered.
If you sign a cell phone contract, it matters little, as you are acting as the Strawman when you do so, same goes for opening accounts etc. In all such circumstances you are acting in the fictional world of commerce as your Strawman/Person. Usually no point in complicating things. The fictions can only do business with other fictions. This is what your Strawman/Person is for. No one will dispute that you are entitled to use this entity for such purposes (except maybe the people that believe “It is illegal to use the legal name”). This is a privilege you have as the beneficiary of that Trust.
Just as one man can be a number of things at different times, such as father/mother, worker, customer, gym member, driver, claimant, defendant, lover, fighter, etc. so can we take on any role we please. We are only limited by our imagination and what we think is suitable.
Another way of signing a paper without actually signing it, is to draw a box around the signing area, and then sign inside the box. The box separates the signing area from the rest of the document. So you have not agreed to anything written in the document itself. But the person demanding the signature will most likely not understand that.
Also, as creatures who originate from a divine or superior domain (Nature or the Tangible Universe) we cannot be forced to do anything in the domain of "Man Made Fictions" without our full informed and willing consent. Thus any agreement or contract formed in the fictional domain/jurisdiction, in order to be binding must be entered into with full knowledge of all factors concerned and willingly. This means that if you are forced or coerced to sign something, it is not valid.
To practically apply that, ask a few questions to the one who claims you must sign something - like:
"What happens if I do not want to sign?"
"What obligates me to sign this?"
They will either give you an open or veiled threat, or give you some negative consequences that will occur if you do not sign. If so, write on the form or document "signed under threat (or coercion)" and then sign. This will void any construed contractual obligation.
But if you ask what causes the obligation, they may simply admit that there is no obligation
and then you can simply smile and politely decline the offer to contract.
Always make the box and any qualifying statements before you sign, or they might snatch the paper away before you have time to write the rest or draw the box.
“All the terms and all the names I have given various notices and paperwork, where do you think I got them from? Is there some authority that says what words you can use and what you must call things? No! I pulled them out of my arse. I could just as well have called them something else and defined them any way I liked to. We make shit up. And so does everyone else.”
This is why I say everything is an offer to do business – as one cannot force a free man to do anything.
There are a few ways one can respond to such an offer. Some of these are honourable others are not.
You can remain silent. Also not very honourable, as we humans like to have communication going. It may also lead to further trouble down the road, as in law silence is usually interpreted as silent consent. When I was young politicians often justified the taking of an unpopular decision by the phrase “We base our decision on the consent of the silent majority”.
In the case of the arresting officer, it could be something like “I accept your offer to arrest Mr KENT BENGTSSON and take him into custody, if you can identify the defendant (remember they want to arrest the Strawman, which is a fiction) and upon presentation of an original accusatory instrument for my inspection.” More about the latter, later in the “course”.
These offers versus counter offers can go back and forth for some time. Just like a buyer and car dealer haggling over a sale.
The Counter Offer is generally the best response to an offer to make business – unless you like the original offer, like for example “We are from the National Lottery, and if you are Mr. KENT BENGTSSON, and can prove it, we are authorized to transfer one million into your account.”
Example: You to Judge: “Are you acting under your oath of office now?” Judge: “I have my oath right here by my side.” He confessed by his failure to answer that he is not. Remember silence is consent. And then he tries to avoid the question by coming with an irrelevant statement. If you accept that you have let him off the hook.
Or a policeman stops your car and asks “Are you John Smith?” and you counter with “Have you just observed me cause any harm or act in a manner putting lives or property at risk?” Him: “No.”
There is a formal way of dealing with offers, using contract and administrative law. This is described in depth in the materials of Creditors in Commerce below. A common name for this process is “The three step process”.
We as people then created laws, rules, customs, agreements, governments, associations, corporations, military, police, justice systems, money, banks, accounting, trusts, etc. etc.
These are all our creations, and as such are junior to us. Thus they can thus only apply to us with our consent. The creation cannot tell the creator what to do – that would be a perversion of the natural order. If the creation can become the master of it's creator, a monster has been created (such as the Frankenstein’s Monster, the Machines in the Terminator movies or a cold unthinking heartless construct manned by unthinking irresponsible zombies – like a modern Government) and for our own good, all effort should be made to destroy or tame any such monster.
Well, you have to take responsibility for the contracts you have entered into during your life, and if you do not like them, you will have to undo them. Contracts can be fluid. They can change with changing circumstances, with new offers or players entering the scene.
Part of your education as a Freedom Seeker should definitely be a good book on contracts. Preferably a popular one for you own country, or one that is used in your country.
When you understand that almost all human interaction is based on contracts, you will see a clearer picture of the human world and be able to deal with it more effectively.
A common misunderstanding is that a contract is a piece of paper with signatures on it. This is not the case. The contract is the agreement of the parties – no papers needed. The paper is the recording of the agreement. That recording may be good to have if any party fails to honour the contract.
Again, when you fully know something, you will have no or few problems with it. Get that contract book, and read it.
I like Mark Stevens asking a Cop in a cross examination “Is it your opinion, that the correct speed limit for the road in question is X miles per hour?” Cop, “No, it's the Law.” Mark, “Oh, so it is someone else’s opinion then.”
On top we have the LAWS OF NATURE.
Below that we have COMMERCIAL LAW which covers interaction between sovereign individuals. In other words someone who is in control of his or her property and not subject to any conditions or limitations when it comes to own life, body or belongings. Two or more sovereign entities has the unlimited power to make any agreement they choose, without any other parties having any say in the matter.
This can be compared with Company Policies” or the rules by which the members of a Gold Club has to abide if they want to be members. It is voluntary to take employment in a company or to join a Golf club, thus one volunteers to follow their rules when one joins. Likewise the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country or through freely chosen representatives.” The corollary of this is that everyone has the right not to be part of a political entity. The democratic principle says that we have the right to choose. That must logically include the choice not to be part of something.
This normally is all legislation that has the word “Act” in it, and covers a multitude of subjects from tax and traffic rules to the fact that it is illegal to cure cancer – or at least claim you can.
Below this would be the rules of companies, clubs, sports, etc. that are registered within the political entity of the Statutory Law. This would be the lowest “law”.
As you can see, the phrase “It's the Law”, need to be met with the question “What law?” or “What Law-form?” and maybe, “What evidence do you have that that law applies to me in this instance?”
One school of thought in this, says that when you follow an order, you are saying with your actions "I am accepting that you have authority over me."
Thus if a policeman tells you to hand over the Drivers License or step out of the car, and you just comply, you have with your actions shown that you subjugate yourself to him.
Now, it may not be a clever thing to refuse to comply, as he might turn violent.
A better way is to ask him as if you never heard him make his request/order - "Would you like to see my drivers license?" or "Do you mind if I step out of the car now?". By doing it that way, you are not following his orders, but you are following your own suggestion instead.
This can be applied to Judges, Court Ushers, and anyone ordering you to do things in a situation where you do not want to grant that person authority over you.
Another great one, that links to the contract law discussed above, is to make known your fee for fulfilling an order. You could say something like "Since I am not a slave and since an order is chargeable, my fee for following any of your orders, is (any amount you fancy, why not make it high), or, say an amount for each action they want to to perform. Have your phone or other device recording the conversation (probably best to start a video recording, but putting it in a pocket or handbag, so as to not aggravate the situation). After a few orders having been fulfilled, you now have a substantial claim against the police officer/official, which can be used as a bargaining chip in future negotiations.
Karl Lenz in the videos below, covers his version of this method.
As an extension of this following orders thing, bear in mind that we do not voluntarily subjugate ourselves when we do not want to. If you do something of your own accord, it can and will be considered to have been done willingly and voluntarily. Gordon hall gave the example in one lecture, about how he once was led up to the gates of a jail, but just before he entered the gates the guards let go of him and said angrily to him "Are you going to carry on being difficult, or not?". As he responded he actually walked into the jail of his own accord - not being forced, led or pushed. Just distracted.
So if arrested, make it known that you do not consent, but also that you will not put up physical resistance if they move or handle you. Then only move when touched. As soon as they let go of you, be still again. This can still be combined with the announcement of charges. Such as Dean Cliffords brother once: "My charge for going over to your patrol car is 5000.00 dollar. And it does not matter if you drag me over there or I walk of my own - the charge remains." And why not, just for the fun of it, add in the question "Do you understand?" as they themselves so often do.
I am a carpenter, cabinet maker and joiner. It took years to learn the basics of this trade and then you never stop learning as you practice your trade and keep up with new materials and methods.
Anything a bit technical takes a bit of effort to learn. If you do not like that, go be a street sweeper or a dustman and let others run your life for you.
Also there are people that have had success with a certain approach or method for years maybe, and then it seems like it does not work any more. I cannot say why that is. Maybe the System has been altered to prevent these remedies from reaching wide usage. Maybe they let some things pass for a while, so that people will start using them – just to that they can catch people on this later. What do I know. My only advice here is that you follow your own instincts and logic, and research things well before you put them to practice. Or test them on trivial matters like traffic tickets to determine if they are valid methods.
The methods that build on the existing system and it's “laws” (Statutory Law) are more likely to succeed than more basic reasoning belonging in Natural Law or Commercial Law, since the fiction can not see or act in the reality.
Here is a very good and well presented video of how we got to where we are now and a few things we can do about it.
“Freedom a complete picture”
Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception:
If you like Rob, there will be more videos suggested by YouTube.
Here is a link to an article in his blog. It is not that long and gives a lot of very basic and relevant information when it comes to the "Law", "Courts", "Authority", etc.
A good place to start in your further education.
I have not joined these or done their courses (which are charged for) but they seem to be good and thorough. Maybe something to consider once you have exhausted what I present here.
Here is the link to Pan Terra PCA: http://panterrapca.org/
And here is the one for Gemstone University: http://www.gemstoneuniversity.org/
They were active about 2009 – 2012. The teachers there were Brandon Adams, Gordon Hall and Jack Smith.
As far as I know Gordon is in Jail and Brandon might too. But I do not have enough information to say if that is because they lacked in knowledge or if they were railroaded to set an example to others who might follow in their footsteps.
Their main message was one of not arguing and fighting, but to settle all claims and demands in order to make everyone whole. I liked this peaceful approach to commerce and much of the philosophy they preached. They may not have had it all right, but they did have a lot right. I have had the most success in Court when using their approach. This have been my main influence in this quest.
Many tend to balk and back off when they realize the amount of materials there is to study here and if that does not get them, Gordon Hall's “Thank God for this wonderful and perfect Government” often did. But Gordon also said “The role of the Government is to Lie, Cheat and Steal, and to drive you back to God.”
Their site is still up and one can download all audio files and many documents from there. The video versions of their workshops can be had for a fee. But there are a few free videos, so one can see what they look like at least. I used to download a workshop and put it on an MP3 player and then listen as I was driving, shopping, taking walks, or when I did work that did not require much thinking (such as sanding wood or spray painting). I listened to most things over and over, and each time I realized more things and got more ideas about how one could deal with different things.
Here are a site that has their workshop audio recordings posted:
Or alternatively, this one:
Then ideally do each one in order. But there will be a lot of talking about something that is not applicable outside the US and which seems to have been clamped down on in the US. Too much to explain here, but when they talk about Original issue and tax form 1099 and similar things, it is about this. Leave alone.
Then I suggest you listen to Gordon Hall talk about application of Contracting.
The first one is “The rules to the game of life”
Best is to do them in chronological order, but if you want a shorter route do the first one which is CIC Chicago Workshop(August 2009)
When you have exhausted that see more recent YouTube videos of his.
He also made a text about how the prison system works, which explains why the US has such a large prison population. Prison Treatise, by Jean Keating:
He made up a series of letters and how to register ones address in a specific way in order to act as the Executor for that estate. I have met a few people that have used this method successfully in the UK. But it seemed pretty limited and mostly effective for being left alone when accosted. I consider it a bit of the puzzle and worth some study, even if you may never use it.
This video should give an introduction:
He has a “Student” called Nathan Fraser, who have had good success in the Courts with this method.
Here are a good point to start with Mark:
Many videos have been removed from YouTube now due to increased sensorship.
When I have found them eleswhere, I have given a new link here:
You tube is full of his talks and interviews. However the best ones (in my opinion) are not available there.
Start with this one and other ones who's title grabs you:
Then for the best. This is a series of radio interviews on how to do things. Study these. At least the ones where Dean appears. And I am also in possession of the audio recording of the one that he was arrested afterwards. You will not have the slides of that presentation, but it will be pretty clear for the most part. This was done in Hamilton. This is contained in the folders “DC How to” and “DC Hamilton” at this page:
Again his approach is relatively simple compared to the commercial routes, but it requires that one does not fall in any of the traps that will be laid by the Judge, in order to drag you into their preferred jurisdiction. Well worth studying and applying if you feel up to it.
Have successfully helped people get their children back when the Child Protection Services or other State bodies have taken peoples children from them, with a very basic request.
Karl in UK Column:
Karl at Johnson City Tennessee:
The first ones I listened to talking about this were a pair calling themselves “Batman and Boris”.
They had come to the conclusion that most countries in this world is under a kind of disguised military occupation, under military law and rules. If you listened to Creditor in Commerce workshops, you might have heard Jack Smith talk about this too. Much of the English political or business language contains military terms. Chief Executive OFFICER, Payroll OFFICER, etc.
When asked about their name they would reply that they were happy to give a name on the condition that it is not used for identification purposes. That is of course why the police asks for a name.
I cannot find the old files from this time, but Batman seems to have been active until recently. He is a colourful character with a refreshing attitude. Looking now, I found a long video covering this approach, so that will be my first link on this subject.
Here is a call where he and Dean Clifford are talking. Judge for yourself who handles himself best there.
“Our housemate, having lived with us for a while now has reached the point where he wants to exercise his right to freely use the fruits of the earth, in this case an abandoned property. We recently found such a property and yesterday went to seize it to his continued use. Once inside, the door was secured and the following notice placed in the front window –
This is an American guy that has done extensive studies and have experience with the “justice system”. He writes and talks on this subject.
Here is a good video by him:
Here again the idea is to not use the name or not let oneself be identified as it. If there is more to it, you can be the Judge of that.
Here is the website: http://losethename.com/
Then there are people who just like to inform us of the truth, or get us to realize we are our own masters and no one can be superior to another against that others will. Or that we are slaves, as some have come to conclude.
The first one that comes to mind here is Larken Rose. He has made lots of YouTube videos and written a book on this.
Here are some very good videos of his, that I often use to make a point.
Statism: The Most Dangerous Religion
Message to the voting cattle
Here is a seminar by him. Natural Law Seminar:
Matrix of Power:
About Muhammed Ali:
If you know of someone or something you think should be added to this page, please let me know by message or comment below.