GREAT NEWS! Although I have not had any written confirmation from anyone working for HMRC that they cannot point out any fault in what I describe below, they did not charge income tax for the years that I have now used this method of filling out the tax return, and have refunded money above what I owed them. See the last update for exactly how this happened.
I just filed the income tax return for my legal person
MR KENT BENGTSSON.
In doing so, I deducted all expenses I could prove by way of receipts, account statements or other records of financial transactions in this name. No matter if they were business expenses or "private" expenses.
So this is basically a test of a method I have figured out myself, based on the principle that a man does not stand within the fictions of Law and Government, except by express agreement/contract.
It also supposes that no man (man, as in member of mankind) is a slave today and that therefore Involuntary Servitude is not lawful.
Since MR KENT BENGTSSON does not exist in the tangible physical reality, but is an entity in the two-dimensional world of "words on paper" (In other words "a fiction") it needs a living man to conduct it's affairs. That living man is me.
And since we do not today practice slavery, no one can be expected to perform work without compensation, unless an expressed agreement to that effect already exists for a given task or period.
Doing everything required of MR KENT BENGTSSON is a fair bit of work. Especially the labour one performs in order to have compensation in the form of money paid to KENT BENGTSSON's accounts.
I am posting this here as a possible outcome of all this could be that the tax man agrees to what I have done or that my person no longer is a tax-payer, on the condition that I do not inform others of what I have done. So that is why I'm sharing this now, in case I cannot tell later. If this did not work out for some reason, I will of course add what happened and any how and why of relevance. If I in a year or so from now provide no further information, assume it worked out.
There is of course the possibility that my tax return will slip through the system unnoticed and I just get a refund of the taxes deducted, with no challenge to the figures provided. If that is the case I will say so too. Then the year after will have the same filing and we will se what happens then.
The invoice text below is the core of my method, and the basis for me deducting as valid expenses things that are listed in it. If challenged I may provide more documents to make my point and require that they disprove my assumptions.
The reason I am doing this, is so that people who have salaries or do work where the employer or customer of a contractor have to deduct tax at source, have a way of getting these taxes back.
This should not be interpreted as a tax dodge. I do not mind paying for essential public services. But I do mind paying for a bloated public service who's first and foremost purpose seems to be to waste mine and your money, or worse, to use these money to control, manipulate and restrict us. Not to mention lining the pockets of politicians and public "servants".
If you decide to try this too, you are of course doing that of your own accord and entirely at your own risk. I can make no guarantees as to a successful outcome. There may be many factors that affect the outcome of this, and I may not have mentioned them.
As the UNITED KINGDOM is also such a fictional creation
Covering services provided from 5 April 2018 until 4 April 2019.
Performing physical labour, creative thinking, operating of machinery and tools when working, as KENT, for other legal persons within the UNITED KINGDOM, such as the firm KASK.
Acting for KENT in the capacity of Landlord, with regard to administrative and physical actions required for the renting out of the house and garden referred to as 20 Bricklands, Crawley Down.
These are the things required as payment for the services provided:
Food
Drink
Nutritional supplements
Equipment for sports, exercise and leisure activities.
Computer, laptop, printers and other hardware and software for these.
Office supplies.
Car rental
Fuel for heating and modes of transport.
Attached or enclosed evidence of this exchange is proof of settlement.
the man that goes by the name of kent, who is of the bengtsson family line and who stands in the tangible world, unfettered by any man made fictions – except by express recorded agreements and contracts. The one with the paramount interest in the legal person MR KENT E. BENGTSSON.
- - - - - - - -
For a more complete view on taxation as practiced today and suggestions on how to pay less check out the page on "Tax" in the tabs at the top of the page.
All the best
Kent
PS. I just filed the figures according to this invoice and my receipts (which had £6000 unaccounted for due to lost receipts) for the year 2018 - 19, and had the tax deductions returned to my Persons Account minus National Insurance contributions.
I had kind of hoped for them to query my figures, but it did not happen this year. Next year I will have more complete invoices and there will be very little of the income that is not matched by receipts, bills, etc. So maybe the challenge comes then. Or maybe they read my Facebook and blog writings and decided not to challenge me, so there is no case tried that others can refer to if they would like to give this a go. Who knows.
[ I did the following years tax return the same way. This time they did not send a refund and when I later contacted them they said they had questions, and that I would be contacted regarding these. This was at the height of Covid and nothing happened. I keep nudging them and in 2021 they suddenly want account statements, etc. Turns out they had changed my tax number but I had not forwarded this to the firm I did work for. So I provided the data and again asked about the questions they said they had about the 19/20 tax return. But still no addressing of this matter at all. ]
APPENDIX 1:
I would also recommend this free course by Brandon Joe Williams in California.
https://onestupidfuck.com/contractkillercourse?
This might be a better idea than what I have done above. But as with anything like this, make sure you are ready for this fight and can stand your ground. So rather spend some time studying what this blog has to offer, as well as what others have to offer, before you go up agains the Tax Man.
Imagine though how much better off you would be if you did not have to say godbye to a large part of the money you get in exchange for your labour. Is that not worth some of your time now, for a great benefit later.
However the lady in the complaints dept. did me the favour of mentioning the legal office's name.
So I wrote them in March 2024. No response. They were given 30 days to respond.
I I have now written them a second time, giving them another opportunity to respond to the points I have raised. That is being mailed tomorrow.
I included both the previous letter they never responded to and a separate Notice in case they do not respond again, as I can then carry on a three step notice process, until I have an administrative judgement in my favour, which I may use to take to small claims court in order to get back money paid in to HMRC by the people I have worked for.
I will not bore you with all the letters back and forth, but have copied the notice below, in case someone is interested to see what I have done.
NOTE!! It is only included here as a record of what I have done. If you decide to do something like that, you do so fully under your own responsibility. Do not come asking me for help if it leads into deeper water than you can swim.
Only do what you are comfortable with and which you are willing to suffer the consequences of. If you have dependants who rely on you for support, do not put them in danger by putting yourself in danger.
Here is my notice:
kent of the family bengtsson, a man.
c/o
123 Anystreet
Anytown
[postcode]
HMRC Solicitor’s Office & Legal Services 31 May 2024
14 Westfield Avenue
Stratford Royal Mail, Signed for #
London E20 1NG NV1234 3638 5GB
NOTICE REGARDING
TAX RETURN
To: Whom it may concern,
This notice is being issued as earlier attempts to deal with this matter in a more informal style appears to have been ignored for at least 3 years now, by different offices within the HMRC.
Let me first give a quick background.
I think it was in 2018 that I decided I was not going to work for free to satisfy various demands from the various UK Government offices. Realising it might be hard to get payment from these entities, I came up with an alternative solution. I was going to charge the juristic person/legal entity/Trust/Estate (whatever it is) MR KENT E. BENGTSSON with NI Number QS123456P (here in after, named KENT), for acting in it’s capacity, as and when needed.
I believe this entity was created in order to give me the ability to do business through the realm of fictions, that we humans have created to facilitate almost all trade and interactions we engage in these days.
Such fictions would be for example be THE UNITED KINGDOM and other commercial nations around the world, banks, corporations, associations, Trusts, etc. etc. These not having any presence in the tangible physical reality, but all being a product of the minds of man.
The living and the tangible, not being fictional, are of course of a higher order than the fictions it created. Also, as the Creator are superior to it’s Creations, and Governments, laws, rules, statutes, money, credits, bonds, etc. etc. are all dreamed up by people, they can only be enforced if consented to first. What further confirms this is that Involuntary Servitude is not lawful any more.
A new way of doing the Tax Return.
So, as we no longer practice Involuntary Servitude (slavery), every man must own him-/herself and his and her time and labour. From this follows that all interactions must be under consent and voluntary.
I am not aware of ever having entered into any express contract or agreement, as a living man of the tangible universe, or in the capacity of KENT, to be subject to the internal rules of THE UNITED KINGDOM, or to work for free for these fictions. In case any past actions of mine has been construed to constitute such agreements, that was a mistake bourne out of ignorance.
I hereby cancel any and all such assumed, presumed or construed agreements and apologise for any inconvenience or confusion this may have caused.
To my defence I must point out that at no time has representatives for the various branches of THE UNITED KINGDOM, come to me and laid the cards on the table and negotiated an express agreement signed by both parties and witnessed.
Now, in case KENT is somehow bound to obey the internal regulations of THE UNITED KINGDOM, and since KENT appears to be a dead legal fiction, it needs a living thinking man to enter into the capacity of this deal legal fiction, when required for things that cannot be done in the tangible reality – such as most commercial transactions and handling of money and credits. As the main beneficiary of KENT, I have done this, and since I am not a slave, I can demand compensation for this work.
Thus I invoiced KENT for my services with the invoice in Attachment 1. as explained in correspondence with Complex and Agents and Customer Compliance Complaints, who were asked to forward the matter to the HMRC legal office to be dealt with. This seem to never have happened and I have not had one word back in response to my new way of doing the tax return for KENT. Hence this notice and formal process.
I made clear to the people in both offices above that I would not file another tax return until this matter is fully resolved, so I guess it is in your interest to sort this out with me.
I furthermore pointed out that I am not a graduate of Law School, thus I am not qualified to interpret the Income Tax Act. So as I understand that, I am not allowed to ever TRY to understand any Act of Parliament. Since I cannot comply with something I cannot understand, I cannot guarantee that I will fill out a Tax Return in the correct way, and therefore I need a letter from a person in your organization that is authorised to indemnify me from any and all mistakes I may make in filling out your Tax Return, due to my inability to truly know what the Income Tax Act is saying.
Here are some portions of my letter to Small Business Compliance, Complex and Agents, of 6 November 2022 (see how long it has been and yet no substantial answer to the points raised) so as to avoid typing it all again. Apologies if this does not flow perfectly with the text above:
To get a grasp of where I come from and the angle I have taken in this matter, please read these attachments:
1. The invoice from me to KENT.
2. “Fiction of law” and “Fiction” definitions. This seems to make the confession that man made law is not real, but a fiction/make believe.
3. Quotes from old US court cases. Whether this is actual or fake, it illustrates well the idea that the tangible and fictions are two separate things.
4. Copy of Declaration of Identity – Kent of the Bengtsson family.
5. Definition of Capacity.
OK, lets have a look at this then. It is my understanding that:
The Crown Corporation of the City of London, the UK Government and all their subsidiaries have been dreamt up of men like you and me and only exist in thoughts and on paper (which are written down thoughts or agreements) and have no presence in the tangible universe (if you think they are physical or real, please give me how much they weigh, their size, temperature, location and density). Thus they are fictions (of Law).
I as a man (see declaration of identity) am part of the natural and tangible world and thus of a higher order than the man made fictions. As such I can enter into a role within the realm of fictions and act in the capacity of a specific fiction (usually for an agreed upon time and compensation, just like you who read this are now acting in the capacity of a fictitious role/office within the larger fiction of HMRC) and are getting paid to do so.
Since the government is a fiction it cannot see or interact with the real and tangible, it cannot “concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them”.
Thus it created a corporate or juristic person with which it CAN interact and which re-presents the man in the realm of fiction. This would in my case be the Resident/Taxpayer/Driver/et cetera MR KENT BENGTSSON which has assigned to it the NI number QS123456P. I understand it is not a living man, but a dead corporate fiction/juristic person. It cannot do anything on its own, and need a living man to act as it when the need arises. That would be undersigned.
I furthermore understand that Involuntary Servitude is no longer practised in this society as well as the other nations of this Earth. Thus all servitude has to be voluntary and per agreement, such as in an Employer - Employee relationship, where someone agrees to under certain scheduled hours serve a boss for an agreed upon compensation in accordance with the employment contract and the regulations in that jurisdiction.
There is no contract that clearly spells out when and where I am to act in the capacity of the corporate/juristic person MR KENT BENGTSSON and what my compensation for doing so is.
That I have done so in the past for free, is due to my ignorance in these matters and the lack of disclosure from the people behind our current system, and may not be interpreted as willing and informed servitude or agreement to perform for free. If any action of mine have lead you to believe that I have agreed to such servitude and to do it for free, I apologise for that and hereby declare that that was a mistake and misunderstanding.
Thus:
For the sake of simplicity and convenience for all concerned, I have decided to charge MR KENT BENGTSSON for all the things I do for it. Surely this is a better alternative than charging the different subsidiaries to the Crown or the Government for whenever I perform things for that entity, and it also takes care of work I do directly for MR KENT BENGTSSON, that does not involve other entities.
Since I am a living flesh, blood and spirit, man. I do not need the fictional money that is used to conduct business between corporate/legal fictions. As a living man I need things like food, shelter, transport, communication, etc.
Thus I have invoiced MR KENT BENGTSSON for all the things I do for it, and it pays for the physical things I need or require. That way I am paid with barter and MR KENT BENGTSSON stays in fiction land with it’s fictional money.
This of course makes all the things I as a man need or require, a legitimate business expense for MR KENT BENGTSSON, and the receipts for all these things is proof of payment of the invoice from the man to the fiction.
Please see Attachment 1, the invoice from the man to MR KENT BENGTSSON for further details.
This most likely brings MR KENT BENGTSSON’S income below the tax threshold. And thus the figures in the 19/20 tax return seem to be wrong. But take attachment 1 into account, and it should all make sense. But MR KENT BENGTSSON still pays many other taxes, such as VAT, fuel duties, tolls, environmental charges, etc. etc. so you still get some money.
In conclusion:
As I see it, the way I am charging MR KENT BENGTSSON for my services, brings it below the income tax threshold and if every receipt, invoice and proof of payment was filed, there would be zero income for MR KENT BENGTSSON.
If the people versed in the law in HMRC can point out a flaw in my reasoning here, using only easily verifiable physical facts and logic (no fictions) please present what you have. If these makes sense or are irrefutable from a viewpoint of pure logic and indisputable facts, and prove that I am a slave or for some other reason have a duty to perform work for the Government for free, I will be happy to revise MR KENT BENGTSSON’S tax return for 19/20 and do the 20/21 within 6 months and after that do the following years.
You have 30 days to respond in substance and prove me wrong. If for some reason you need more time, you may appeal for more time. If you do not respond, it will be considered in accordance with the maxim of law that says that “He who remains silent, agrees”.
Since this is the second presentment of this matter to SOLS, you are already in default and by your silence have agreed that my presumptions above are correct and that I have done no wrong. But as I mentioned in my cover letter, if your failure to respond was due to some internal mistake or slip up, I hereby give you a second chance to set things right.
If you cannot show how I am wrong above or if you chose to remain silent, you agree to return any and all deductions from invoices of KENT that has been sent to HMRC under the CIS scheme, minus NI contributions, to the bank account of KENT. If that is the case, then I see little reason to fill out and submit any more tax returns for KENT, but if you can give me a compelling reason for doing so, I will.
All claims made by any man or woman holding a position within HMRC, regarding this need to be made under that persons full private commercial unlimited liability, taking full responsibility for what is claimed or said and any potential consequences thereof.
The respondent need to give his/her full name and sign with a wet ink signature or autograph. Anonymous replies will be considered a “no reply”.
I hope we can find an amicable solution to this.
Sincerely and in peace
Signed under my unlimited liability as a man.
kent of the bengtsson family, a man.
Settlor and Main Beneficiary of MR KENT BENGTSSON
You have my declaraton of Identity in the article "Make your own ID".
The old quote from US court cases:
a. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction,
and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other
artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The
legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law,
agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."* S.C.R.
1795, **Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.
54;* and,
b. "the contracts between them" involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as
Corporate Entities:
c. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union,
are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an
"individual entity"",* Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed.
1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
Fiction of Law:
The assumption that a certain thing is true, and which gives to a person or thing a quality which is not natural to it, and consequently establishes, a certain disposition, which, without the fiction, would be repugnant to reason and to truth. It is an order of things which does not exist, but which the law prescribes or authorizes. It differs from presumption because it establishes as true, something which is false; whereas presumption supplies the proof of something true.
The law never feigns what is impossible. Fiction is like art; it imitates nature, but never disfigures it. It aids truth, but it ought never to destroy it. It may well suppose that what was possible, but which does not exist; but it will never feign that what was impossible actually is.
Fictions were invented by the Roman praetors who, not possessing the power to abrogate the law, were nevertheless willing to derogate from it under the pretence of doing equity. Fiction is the resource of weakness which, in order to obtain its object, assumes as a fact what is known to be contrary to truth: when the legislator desires to accomplish his object, he need not feign, he commands. Fictions of law owe their origin to the legislative usurpations of the bench.
It is said that every fiction must be framed according to the rules of law, and that every legal fiction must have equity for its object. To prevent their evil effects, they are not allowed to be carried further than the reasons which introduced them necessarily require.
CAPACITY:
7. COUNTABLE NOUN [in NOUN]
If you do something in a particular capacity, you do it as part of a particular job or duty, or because you are representing a particular organization or person.
[written]
She visited the Philippines in her capacity as a Special Representative of Unicef. [+ as]
This article is written in a personal capacity.
Morley served in many capacities: as a critic, director, notable biographer and broadcaster.
That is all for now. I will update if and when there are more to report.
Update 30 September 2024:
I just got some letters from HMRC regarding the 3 years of Tax returns I turned in, in August 2024.
I did these tax returns in accordance with above method and I attached the paperwork of my invoice from me to my legal person as well as copies of earlier letters where I explained my exact reasoning as per the notice above.
When I first looked at the statements that accompanied the letters, it looked like they had deducted taxes for the year 20/21 and 21/22, but not for the year 22/23 where the full amount of taxes prepaid was marked as overpaid.
But when I sat down and gave it a good read today, I noticed that the money they had deducted was not income tax, but was the "Covid Lockdown Subsidies" I had received in the two first years and the penalty for falesly claiming these subsidies. These subsidies were 80% of a sole traders average income.
But now when I, through using the above method, declared zero taxable income for those years, they can claim that "if you had no income, then you should not have gotten any subsidies, as that was based on your income. So therefore we will consider these subsidies as not applicable and will take them back from what you have paid in in the form of tax deducted from your invoices to the builder you have been sub-contracting for, as well as the penalties for the false claim".
I am not going to contest that. This is a game, and fair play to them for coming up with this as one way of getting back at me and not having to pay out much in tax returns. Also those subsidies where very wellcome when during the lockdown, I had almost no work and earnings.
But the main thing here is that they DID NOT challenge my way of doing the tax returns and for the last year marked the full amount that had been prepaid by the building firm, as "income tax overpaid".
This is a victory.
As for me asking them to show me a deficiency in my reasoning and the way I am doing my tax return, they are still very silent. So I will carry on my notices until I have a private administrative judgement in the matter. I do not think they will ever challenge me or respond in a meaningful way to this - but one never knows. If they do, then I will deal with that, as and when.
Yes and No. I had hoped for a confession by the legal Eagles at HMRC that I was right and that they had no valid objection to it and that I could show that to others who have their taxes deducted at source so that they had a way of getting those taxes back. This has not happened and I now very much doubt that it will. Still anyone who wants to do what I have done here, is free to try this for themselves. I take no responsibility for any consequences of such a pursuit.
I had also hoped that if that did not happen, that a representative of the HMRC would contact me to make a deal for my silence. That has not happened so far.
But that does not take away from the fact that at this writing they have honoured my accounting and kind of acknowledged that I am not a slave and that the legal person/tax payer MR KENT BENGTSSON is a separate fictional entity and that one cannot be forced to do work for it without compensation.
I do not know about you, but to me that is a big win.
I have shared this here so that others that would like to give this a go, can see what I have done. I do not expect a lot of people to do so. I am not some high profile character with thousands of followers and I am not interested in becoming some front figure trying to bring down a corrupt and parasitic system.
I write what I write in the hope that some people will realize they own themselves and that they are not a cog in a machine, but something far more divine and valuable.
Let me finish with the very clever logic of Larken Rose, who I have a lot of respect for.
