How you, sort of, became a slave

Have you ever asked yourself "If I am a result of the evolution of species in Nature (or of Divine creation - if you are religious) how is it that something that we humans have created can have a higher rank in the order of things, than man himself?".

If I establish a garden, I decide what will grow in it and where it will grow.

If I create a company, I decide what it will produce or trade in.

If a group creates an association or club, they decide what they will do and what kind of rules they will have among themselves.

So the creator is always superior. For the creator can create the creation, but the creation cannot create its creator. Read it again and ponder.

So, how did it turn out to be completely reversed - which we see every day in our society? Our public institutions, corporations and banks seem to have more power than us humans, who either invented them or gave our consent to their creation or existence - in that we acknowledge their existence and use them in our lives.

Well, it has to do with a number of things that some clever and enterprising people came up with. More on this later.

If you create something that then becomes more powerful than yourself - you have then created a monster. It may not act like a monster at first, but appears to be a good and beneficial thing. But mark my words "Sooner or later it will hurt or enslave you".

Look at "Frankenstein's Monster" or "The Machines" in movies like The Matrix or The Terminator. See how the military, which was created to protect a country, has in many cases done military coups and seized power in the country. See how companies treat their employees. See how governments treat their "citizens".

So, how did it happen?

First, let's take a little look back in history. Not so long ago, slavery was a widely accepted practice. You could simply become a slave if you could not defend yourself against slave traders. One could also be born a slave. Furthermore, one could enslave oneself by entering into a contract to serve others for a certain period of time - for example, to pay a debt or for a trip across the Atlantic, or simply because one was destitute and as a slave one at least received some food and a roof over ones head.

But humanity progressed a little and having slaves was looked down upon more and more. Also, guarding them was costly and they did not work willingly, so were not efficient. So a new more efficient approach was needed. 

Also, some bright mind came up with a list of "Human Rights" and it began to spread and be adopted in most places and today it is no longer legal to enslave one's fellow human beings. Even though it is still done in some places or fields, in the traditional sense. In it’s place came a more subtle kind of slavery that today is applied to most people in this world.

You could say that a slave is someone who has no right to the fruits of his labour, except for food, clothing and shelter. Everything else is taken from the slave. They don't even own the rights to their children. A bit like the animals on a farm.

But, you might say, most of what we produce today is actually taken away from us through taxes and for some there is just enough left to cover food, clothing and housing. And if a social worker dislikes you, they can take your child too. So what has actually changed?

Well, you see, today we don't have slavery any more, because everything happens voluntarily – even if it is done in a cunning manner.

Involuntary servitude is now illegal, but voluntary servitude is perfectly OK.

         

To understand how this happened, one needs to understand the use of fictions. A fiction is something created by our minds - as opposed to something that exists in the tangible universe. Harry Potter and the Hogwarts School are fictions. Donald Duck and Duckburg are also fictions. The Minister of Justice and the Cabinet Office are of course also fictions, in that they are made-up things and cannot be touched or spoken to (if you try to talk to them, you will be talking to a real live human with a name, who is ACTING in the capacity of these fictions ). That human is not the position or the office. If this is difficult to understand, read this article here in the blog: Are we living in reality or a fantasy world?

Today we have lots of Fictions that perform all kind of functions and purposes. In fact, it has gone so far that we tend to see the fictions as something real and forget that they are nothing without the people (John, Sarah, Emma, David, etc.) who act as them. We say "Bring that up with the Human Resources Manager" rather than "Talk to Sarah about that". For Sarah, could tomorrow be Jane and it is not the human being Sarah, but the fiction “the Human Resources Manager”, you want to talk to (based on the fiction you act as). Or we only see John, Sarah or David as the titles they hold. Like when we say "Joe Biden" we don't mean "that senile old bloke who like to sniff the hair of little girls", but we mean the position "The President of the United States of America". This has probably been created deliberately, to blur the distinctions between the tangible and the fictional.

So, I hope now you can see that the State is a fiction. I have an old book on International Law from the late 1800’s, in one of the first pages the author mention the term “The Large Commercial Nations” as if it was something everyone was aware of (that they are commercial entities, and thus fictional in their essence).

Since the imagined cannot be superior to the real and tangible, you get a problem if you want to rule over other people. It does not fit in that well with the basic idea that we are all of equal value, with equal rights and have equality before "the law". So the clever and enterprising people who invented the system we have today came up with the brilliant idea of "creating a fictional counterpart to anything tangible - especially humans and making them believe they ARE the fiction".

And Hocus Pocus, the tables were turned and as long as the people believe they are the fictitious counterpart, they are subordinate to the higher-ranking fictions - such as the Government, the Police, the Tax Office, The Crown, the EU, the UN, etc. etc.

So slavery was not actually abolished. Instead, everyone was made into a kind of slave.

So what is our fictional counterpart? Well in my case it is the legal person whose name is written in capital letters (like the name of a ship – a dead vessel), KENT ERIK BENGTSSON with National Insurance number/Social Security number. This is either some kind of corporation within the larger fiction (and corporation) The UNITED KINGDOM, or it is a Trust, as there is no obligation to inform a beneficiary of a Trust of the details of the Trust. If you want to have some fun, try to find out what exactly our legal Person/Entity is.

Here is what is said to be an extract from an American judgment in the eighteenth century. Even if not genuine, it illustrates perfectly what I am trying to say here.

a. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction,
and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other
artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The
legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law,
agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."* S.C.R.
1795, **Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.
54;* and,
 
b. "the contracts between them" involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as
Corporate Entities:
 
c. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union,
are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an
"individual entity"",* Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed.
1143, 56 S.Ct. 773

Read that a few more times and let it sink in.

In Sweden where I am from, and employee of the Finance department admitted to a friend who was pressing them for an answer to what Sweden actually is in legal terms, that “Sweden is a Juristic Person”.

The United States Declaration of Independence states that “All power comes from the people”. Thus the People is the creator of the Government and is actually senior to it. And in this article we are taking a look at how the people who have grabbed power has managed to get around that fact.

The people are living people in the tangible reality. The citizens, on the other hand, are shadow figures in the Land of Smoke Screens and Mirrors where Unicorns and Prime Ministers roam.

So "The People" still have all the power - if only they could realize that they are the creators of all the fictions and that they HAVE a legal entity (Person), which they can use to navigate Fictionland. Your "Person" is a kind of voluntary slave, and if you have forgotten what you are, or if at any given time, you are acting as your Person, that includes you too.

You need your Person as a lot of business and interactions are today done by using fictions. Even the bulk of the money supply is fictitious these days. Cash is just a very small part, and if the banks get what they want, there will be only fictional money with no substance, even in paper. You cannot make a phone call without using an account opened by your legal Person. You cannot open a bank account or do transactions as the living Man you are (Man, in the meaning, a member of Mankind), but have to step into the role of your legal Person and sign the papers in the capacity of it, or as the surety for it. Your legal Person is like a token in a Monopoly game or an Avatar in a computer game. The flesh and blood you, cannot enter the game, so you need something that re-presents you in that realm.

A tremendous amount of work has gone into indoctrinating us to believe that we are our Person and forget that we are the Creators of it and everything else. Without us, the legal entity could not be created or exist. Enormous sums have been spent to maintain this illusion.

It's a bit like taming strong animals like horses or elephants. They are handled daily from birth, so that they become so used to being handled and controlled that they take for granted that we humans are in charge of them and that they just have to obey. A wild horse or elephant has completely different opinions and it takes a lot of work to tame a wild horse, and I don't even know if it's possible with an elephant.

A zookeeper never gives his animals a choice to go free or remain in his "care". In the same way, our "Government" does not give us the choice between, not to be ruled or becoming self-governing. It would be a kind of suicide from their point of view. We can survive without them, but they cannot survive without us.

So realize that as a human being you are superior to the fictions. You are of a higher order than them. They are figments of the imagination and you are real and tangible. They exist only in the two-dimensional world of paper and in the world of thought, while you exist in the three-dimensional physical reality. And as the quote above says, the imagined cannot obtain equality with the tangible. Therefore, the fiction cannot see you and it needs another fiction (your legal Person) that it can see in your place. The people acting as the fictions, on the other hand, can see you, but don't want to, because they prefer to rule over you, rather than humbly take their place by your side as an equal. Or they too believe that a Person and a Human are the same thing.

This is basically how we were, in a sense, enslaved. It was done without spilling a drop of blood. Without torture or physical coercion, so the ruling class can calmly say "Nah, we haven't forced anyone. Everyone just follows the structure of society of their own free will and shouolders their responsibility for a functioning society".

A little more detail

In the English speaking world, which I am most familiar with legally, birth certificates are issued as proof that a Legal Person has been created and in some countries they even have a "Bond Number" like a share or other security , which can be tracked in the financial market to see what the value is at a given time. Some have turned to stockbrokers and asked them to track this number and report what they found. Staggering amounts have been reported in some cases.

Let me just mention here that I know of no one who has managed to get access to such accounts and draw funds from them. But it appears some have been able to offset debts with certain writings authorising the use of such accounts. But just as many if not more have been arrested for fraud or falsifying financial instruments. So my recommendation is to stay well away from all this. Also, be VERY sceptical towards anyone who, for a fee, will see to it that you get access to this account. This can only mean they have not gotten access to theirs - or there would be no need to ask for a fee.

In countries like the USA and Canada, you have to apply for a "Social Security Number" if you want a pension and other benefits, but it is not a must. Here in England you get a "National Insurance Number" from HMRC (our Tax Office) and the money you pay into that account is meant to go to unemployment benefits and the basic pension. So you APPLY to be seen as a legal person or to receive benefits as such. In other words, you ASKED FOR IT.

In contract law, actions speak louder than words. If you do something, it can be interpreted as accepting the unwritten contract - like getting on a bus or ordering food in a restaurant. So if we pay taxes, get a driver's license, get a fishing license or a professional license, we say with our actions "We see ourselves as subordinate to the State and agree to all the conditions attached to these "benefits", forgetting that we already had the right to travel on our home planet, work, etc.

So even if our Person is a Legal Person, what makes it subordinate to other legal persons - such as the State, Councils, Banks, Police, the Courts, etc and all their internal regulations? If people are equal before the law, aren't legal persons also equal before the law? Maybe so, but I guess it's all the things we've done in its name, which are interpreted as us submitting to the State. We have obediently gone to school, declared our "income", obtained licenses for various things, paid a lot of fees and TV license, etc. etc. All these things we did in the capacity of our PERSONS, not as living people. So we must be seen as volunteers or employees. That is the only way all the internal rules that apply within the legal entity The UNITED KINGDOM can apply to our PERSONS. If you work in a company, you must follow its rules. If you do not work for a company, it's rules are irrelevant to you.

Perhaps our person is seen as a government office, and we as humans are the ones holding that "job".

If we identify ourselves with a Passport, Driver's License or "approved" ID, we identify ourselves as our PERSON and thereby say that we are acting in that capacity at the time. There is no recognized ID if one wants to identify oneself as a living man, standing in the tangible physical reality outside all the fictions. When you identify yourself with these IDs you seem to be saying "all your laws and regulations apply to me", as an employee or volunteer.

So the whole thing, while not illegal, is at least dishonest and deceitful - and therein lies different ways of attacking it all.

One such way would be to ask for the contract showing that you have agreed to do things required by authorities, without compensation. Or ask for the salary statement showing that you are an employee with obligations to comply with their internal regulations ("laws").

Backing this conclusion of mine, is that, in the book ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 10^th Edition by Wade & Forsyth, on the first page of chapter 3 it says “The Crown itself, however, has relatively few important legal powers, except in the capacity of employer.”

Then we have additional mechanisms to keep us in the fold. A very popular one is Debt. If you have debts, you are not free, so they cheerfully give out Credit Cards, "Loans" and sell things on credit. Now you have yet another hook on the person and an excellent way to make serious money from us. We also have the Student Loans that follow us through life, in many cases, and bind us financially even more to the State.

Then they can use different means to make it so complicated or expensive to run a company, that there will be fewer jobs and more unemployed people. Thus, people are afraid of losing their jobs, and will tolerate worse conditions and worse wages without complaining or protesting in a constructive way.

Add to this a huge propaganda apparatus that the former Soviet Union would proud of - where we are dictated to through the media, pressure groups, legislation, schools, policies of the workplace, etc. Those that do not tow the line can get different negative names, such as “racists”, “right wing”, “anarchists”, etc. and may find it hard to get jobs in or stay in certain professions, as a result.

Solutions

If we understand the above, and on our own examine this thoroughly enough to understand how it works and is used to keep us in "Voluntary Servitude", then we can try different ways to break our mental shackles.

They try to make us believe that "The law is watertight and solid" and if a loophole is discovered, it is quickly sealed. Nothing could be further from the truth. The whole system is a big House of Cards and if you pull out one of the cards at the bottom, the whole thing collapses.

So, what would such a "bottom card" be? Why not the fact that we humans are the creators of the whole system, and not what it created. That we are a product of Mother Nature or something divine and are of a higher order than our fictions. Only Nature or a possible God can rightly do what it wants with us. If the State thinks it is above Nature, let it change the freezing point of water or the degree of gravity we are subjected to, if it can.

Actually, being a fiction, the State is of a lower order than an Amoeba in a drop of pond water. The Amoeba can act on it’s own. It can reproduce itself, and it can affect the surroundings to some degree. The state on the other hand, needs living people to do ANYTHING it does, for it.
If we consider this a bit, we could say that the State does not exist, and what it actually is, is a group of people who have taken upon themselves to rule, rob, deceive, harass, threaten, imprison and in some cases kill, the very people they claim to care for and protect.

Sorry about that rant. Back to the subject of how we can file a bit on our invisible shackles.

We must assert our right as living human beings, and we have fundamental legal principles and the Declaration of Human Rights on our side. People have human rights - not Legal Persons. So announce to all concerned that you will only temporarily act in your legal person capacity, and that in all private dealings you will act as the living Man you are.

This blog contains a whole host of strategies and suggestions on how to apply this in different ways. But they will only work if in your heart you fully understand these principles and are willing to stand up for their enforcement. If you're going to give up at the first slight resistance or threat, do yourself a favour and stay in the fold. Realize also that when all else fails, they can always fall back on the "Might is Right" principle and with the help of the police arrest and drag you into custody and then through the farce that is our "Justice System". So if you are responsible for children or others who depend on you for their survival, don't put yourself in danger.

Leave it to those who are willing to risk this or don't have much to lose.

For a more complete explanation of what to expect if you enter this game - both negative and positive, read the article How Truth Seeking will affect you.

If you do any of these things I describe, you do so at your own risk and responsibility. I can't guarantee anything because the biggest variable here is different people - both yourself and those you will wrestle with. I have no control over them. I write what I write to enlighten and encourage people to think for themselves and take control of their lives. Consider it entertainment or theories if you will. But if no one is willing to break new ground or try new unproven methods, not much will change.

A simple way to respond to various demands for obedience, action or money is to stop doing things for free and insist on being paid for what you do. Realize that you as a human being do not have to do something that a fiction dictates, unless you have already made an agreement to do so - like when you take a job in a company. But rather than just refuse and all the confrontation that might lead to, let them know that since slave labour is outlawed today, you will do whatever they ask or recommend - but only if they pay a fair compensation first (in advance - because we don't trust them, because they so often act deceitfully). So accept their offer to fill out a tax return form or whatever they want, but ask them to pay you a fair compensation first. Use some standard consulting fee or what their inspectors charge per hour to come visit and harass people. They've already set the tone there, so can't complain if they get the same treatment.

This can even be used on fines. Write back to the Police or Parking Company and say that you will pay as soon as you have received payment of your "Administration Fee" (which should preferably be higher than their fine amount). If they can charge for their "services" so can you.

Suggested solutions in this Blogg

If you would like to try some different approaches in dealing with the vultures, or just would like to know a few things to protect yourself in general, I recommend that you take some time and study the page in the tabs at the top here, called “Educate Yourself”.

For a suggestion on how to make an ID of your own, where you identify yourself as a living member of mankind and make a distinction between the true you and the legal person, go to the article “Make your own ID”.

If you are brave enough to take on the Tax Man, there are some suggestions on how to pay less direct taxes in the blogg-page called “Tax” in the tabs at the top. Also see the article “A different approach to income tax”.

For some different questions one can ask people who believe they have a right to demand performance from us without giving compensation, please see the article “Tricky Questions”.

Another article here that is relevant to the above is “Do’s and dont’s in dealing with Officials”.

Yet another that may be of interest is “Open letter to authorities”.

As you can see, the blogg is dedicated to solutions or possible methods of asserting ones right to be relatively free. Again, let me stress that if you apply this in your life, you do so at your own risk. I have no control over what you do with this information, so cannot be held responsible for any results, good or bad. I want you to take your time and be well prepared if you decide to challenge the status quo. Many has learned a little bit and then stupidly have bit off more than they could chew or gotten into deeper waters than they were equipped to handle. Don't be a fool.

Start small on things that will not get you into any greater trouble – like parking fines, speeding fines, etc. If you mess up or the water gets too deep, all it will cost you is usually a bit more money.
Also if you do this just to save money, it is generally more work than it is worth, to get out of paying a fine. From a pure economic standpoint, it makes better sense to pay the fine and earn some more money.

One of the people I learned from put forth this argument for learning this stuff. “Practice this on small things. Go to Court, as the courts are the modern battle field and they can be quite intimidating. Even if you get a limited experience there and lose some of your fear, you stand a far better chance if you one day are arrested and dragged in there in chains.”
Solicitors and lawyers have sworn an oath where they pledge allegiance to the Court, first and foremost, and to the client, secondly. So use them at your own risk. Also when you use them, you declare yourself incompetent and in need of someone doing the job for you, thereby losing all standing as a sovereign being.

Also, have some fun with all this. It is not that serious. You will only be dealing with your fellow man. He may think he is superior to you, but you should know different by now.

A Canadian “Freeman” once asked the Judge in court “Your Honour, would it be contempt of court if I called the prosecutor a lying bastard?” Judge: “Yes”. Freeman: “Alright, in that case I will not call him a lying bastard.”

Good Luck!

Kent

And in the spirit of fun, have a listen to this song:

Notice regarding my rights

 It seems the wheels have been set in motion now, to change all countries on Earth and implement a more open central control of our lives. We may get a future where the ignorant will find s/he have no rights when it comes to his / her own body and very limited rights to travel and conduct business. It may even be so that those who have taken precautions to be exempt from such control, will be met with brute force, unless they are members of certain "Elite groups".

We are however not at such a point yet, and for all we know, such a future may not happen.  But if we listen to what the "movers and shakers" say, and have said for a long time, we can see that it would be prudent to take any precautions to prevent such a scenario.

One very universal viewpoint of law, is that if one is presented with something one does not like, but do not say NO! or express ones disagreement or withhold ones consent, it is understood as agreement to what was presented.

Another maxim of law is that "Actions speak louder than words".  So if you comply with the rules dreamed up by the people that act as government, department of justice, etc. then you are assumed to have given your consent.

However, assumptions and presumptions can be destroyed by simply expressing what one understands and agrees with, and not.

Put into the equation that the burden of proof rests on the one making a claim, such as "The law applies" and not the other way around, then one should preferably word anything in such a way that one does not have to prove things, but that any opponent that claims something must prove their claim.

So it is up to each one of us to stand up for our rights and get an agreement from those that want to bind us or enslave us, that they do not have the right to do so and that we do not agree with their presumptions and assumptions that we do agree to be ruled and bossed around by them.

For this reason I have made up a notice that I intend to sent to a few key players - letting them know where I stand with regard to myself, my body and my legal person, and if they do not agree with what I understand to be the way things are, to present me with proof that destroys my presumptions.
And if they cannot provide such proof, they agree that I am correct and they cannot do what they want to me and my possessions, no matter how many "laws" they dream up.

Here is the Notice. I have intentionally written it in a manner that is pretty conversant and relaxed, as I am speaking as the man that I am, and I am speaking to those of my fellow men that will receive this. The ones opening the mail, will probably not be educated in law or the inner workings of the system, so I am hoping I write in a way they can understand and thus get them to think about these issues themselves.  If one understands something, one is less likely to write if off as nonsense, and throw it in the dustbin.

NOTICE

To:  Each man, woman or juristic person who may be affected by the things brought up below.


Note:  All words in this notice carry the meaning assigned by undersigned. No legal or statutory definitions may be assumed to apply. If something is not clear, please contact undersigned for clarification.



Since the UK Government have implemented exceptional measures aimed at limiting the spread of the pathogen claimed to re responsible for the Covid-19 condition, which appear to remove our Natural Rights that we are born with, I need some clarification, as well as make clear where I stand in relation to all this.

It is my understanding that: 

I am a creation of Mother Nature or some other divine creator, which I do not fully know or understand. Man is one of the living organisms that has evolved on the Earth. Our creator gave us pretty free reigns as to where and how we live, and seem to let us be in charge of our own lives and destiny, as long as we live in harmony or balance with the other life forms with which we share this planet, as can be observed in Nature.

All men (Man: any member of mankind, whether male, female or a child) were created equal and in possession of inalienable natural rights, which no other man or group of men may remove. The only exception may be where someone has violated those same rights of his fellow Man, and thus has with his/her actions shown that he/she does not deserve the protection of these rights. This means that no man can be another man’s master and by the same token, no man can be another’s slave.

The Creator is senior to or superior to the Creation.

Fictions created by Man, such as man made laws, regulations, guidelines, governments, councils, corporations, trusts, EU, UN, WHO, IMF, commercial instruments, money, credit, and other such fictions, are of a lesser order than their creator – which is Man.  Thus they can only apply to a living Man if that Man consents to them having power over him/her. Since this is such a basic and important thing, this consent need to be expressed and recorded, and cannot be assumed or construed.

Involuntary Servitude is no longer practised in today’s society. Only voluntary servitude is lawful.

If a man made fiction is meddled with, so that it no longer acts or serves in the manner it was first intended, the people who agreed to consent to it or obey it in the past, has the right to withdraw any and all consent, obedience and support from it.

Taking the above points into consideration, all interaction between different people, between people and legal/juristic persons and between legal/juristic persons of equal standing, must be knowing, voluntary and agreed upon, with no use of force, threat or blackmail.

A Man can give up his natural rights to some degree, by contract or agreement – such as in martial arts or boxing competitions, where the participants can practice certain violence against each other. But even there we have rules for what can and cannot be done and how one can give up, and thereby have the right to not be harmed any more.
Or when one enters into an employment and agrees to take a role subservient to other roles within, or the owner, of the company.  But also there we do have a contract and terms for cancelling it. Also most such employer employee relationships involve an agreed amount of compensation in exchange for certain hours of performance or certain tasks being carried out.  No compensation – no duty to perform.


If you, who are reading this, think that I am wrong in any of these understandings, please show me where and how I am wrong. I am writing this as the living natural man I am, and not in any fictional role or office within the fictions invented by man.  Such as the juristic person MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON who has the NI Number AB12345678C, or any other such fiction. Thus you cannot use any “law”, rules, statutes, etc. conceived by the minds of my fellow men. You may only use easily observable facts or laws of Nature.

If you cannot show any such indisputable facts that can be observed or demonstrated in the tangible universe, you agree that my my understandings above are true, correct and valid.

My Rights

As far as I can recall, I have not entered into any agreement or contract(s) where I with full  knowledge of all relevant facts, commitments, terms and consequences, have willingly and voluntarily agreed to, whether as the living man I am or in the capacity of the juristic person MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON, subjugate myself to any man made fiction, such as the UK Government, the Crown Corporation, Her Majesty the Queen, EU, UN, WHO, etc. etc.  These are all of a lesser standing than a Man in that they are the products of the minds of men.  I am a man in the tangible physical reality – they are fictions that only exists on paper and in the minds of men. They lack life and substance and can only exist as long as the real living people believe in them or grant them validity by believing in them or by using them or obeying the people who act in the capacity of these fictions.

If you think I am wrong here, please let me know when, where and how I was presented with all the facts and relevant information regarding my interaction with such entities and how I expressed my consent to be governed by them or perform for them without compensation or gave them free reign to make decisions for me and control what I may or may not do – as long as I cause no harm to my fellow man. Please also show me when, where and how I was given the information on how to break up this relationship, should I wish to do so.  Please show this with my original signature and the signatory of the one acting for these fictions.

If this has not been done, and there are no express agreement or contract, that fulfils all the required components of a lawful contract, I do not see how I have any obligation to obey any Acts of Parliament or other rules within the legal/juristic persons of The United Kingdom, The Crown, EU, UN, WHO or any other similar constructs outside the physical realm – no matter if currently existing or future ones.  This also removes any presumed or assumed rights these institutions believe they have with regard to doing anything at all to or with my body, no matter how such actions would be justified. The only exception would be in cases where I have cancelled my own rights by violating the rights of my fellow men, and done them actual intentional harm.

If you cannot show such agreements or contracts, then I have to conclude that I am in full possession of my Natural / God given rights, which I was born with. For example, the right to travel freely where I please on land, water or in the air. Or doing what I please with my own body and other property. And to form agreements or chose not to, with other people or juristic persons, such as corporations, municipal corporations, governments, and other organizations or entities, as I please and without interference or demands from any uninvited third party.


Regarding my legal person MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON

Here is what is allegedly a quote from a judgement in the US from the late 1700’s.  I include it here, not as proof of anything, but as it expresses the the order of things in a way that makes sense to me.

“a. "Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction,
and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other
artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance,
is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The
legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law,
agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than
corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."* S.C.R.
1795, **Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators 3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall.
54;* and,

b. "the contracts between them" involve U.S. citizens, which are deemed as
Corporate Entities:

c. "Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union,
are classified as property and franchises of the federal government as an
"individual entity"",* Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed.
1143, 56 S.Ct. 773”


As I understand it, the legal person was created in an attempt to bring the free living people into the  realm of man made fictions, where they could be construed to be holding a junior position and thus be considered liable to comply with all the internal policy of these fictions. To make people believe they are this legal person, the same name was given to it, as the name of the man or woman it represents, although the legal persons name seem to be mostly written in upper case letters, or with a title or number attached.

As living men cannot enter  into the fictional world of corporations, trusts, body politics, associations, etc. (words on paper) any more than a living man can step into the world of a computer game, he or she needs an “avatar” to act in his place when using the fictions to conduct business or transactions in the realm of these fictions, just like one needs one to act in a computer game.

My legal person appears to be MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON.  The spelling is in upper case letters like the name on a headstone on a grave, maybe this is done to signify that it is a dead entity or maybe there is some other explanation.  I will assume that in all correspondence received from any of the man made fictions, it is the legal person that is addressed, as the fictions cannot see their creator or something outside their boundaries. Which a living man or woman would be.

As most transactions today are done within the fictional realm, each man need to be given a legal person in order to interact with other men or with other legal fictions such as corporations, and this is listed as a human right in the UN declaration of human rights. “One has the right to be recognized as a person”.  So if one has that right, the opposite must equally be true, that one has the right not to be recognized as a person.

We were not taught about these things in school or directed to places where we can learn about these things later in life, which at least appears deceptive, if not fraudulent. Instead we seem to be assumed, from the viewpoint of the people acting for the man made fictions, to always be acting as the legal person and always as men be in that role – which makes the man and the legal fiction more or less the same.  But is that really so? How can it be so?  From where I sit, it cannot be so.

In fact I very seldom act in the capacity of the legal person KENT ERIK BENGTSSON, but in most situation I am acting as the living man I am, who possess a set of inalienable natural rights, which no man, group of men and certainly no fiction have the authority to remove.

Again, if you believe I am wrong in my conclusions and understandings above, please show me where and how I am wrong, backed by indisputable facts that can be observed in the tangible physical reality, or in the form of a lawful contract.  If you cannot do this, you agree that I am correct.

Based on the above, I assume that my legal person is a Trust, a Corporation or seen as an Office within one of the man made fictions. I find a Trust the most likely as there is no duty to inform a beneficiary of a Trust, about the details of the trust. I also assume that I, as a man, is seen as the beneficiary, the Fiduciary or the Trustee of this trust, depending on the situation and what the various public bodies that contact the Trust wants, as the situation may be. There being no mutually agreed upon contract or even Trust Indentures, they probably feel they can construe the roles to be what is of most benefit for them.

However, since this entity could not be created without me being born and without my parents registering my birth, I can only conclude that I am the Settlor/Trustor of this trust, since I am now of mature age, and have taken over the responsibility for it from my parents.  As such I am the paramount interest holder and the one with the highest authority with regard to the legal person MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON. It represents my value as a living man and my birthright and share of my country of birth (which most likely still resides in Sweden).   I am also a beneficiary of this Trust, as I need it in order to conduct business through The United Kingdom and other such fictions.
As a Trust is not a Trust if all positions are held by one and the same individual, I can not see that I am the Trustee, as that would collapse the Trust. Thus I can only conclude that someone holding office within one of the man made fictions is the Trustee.  Also to be the Trustee, I would need to be informed of the appointment, be aware of the rules of the Trust, be educated to manage a Trust, have accepted the appointment of Trustee and be compensated for my work as a Trustee. None of which has been done.

As the Settlor of this Trust, I require that I am fully informed as to the nature of and all relevant aspects of this Trust (if it is not a Trust, then please let me know what my legal person is and why). Full disclosure please. Please let me know where I can access this information. If you fail to do this, then I may express this trust and dictate the rules of the Trust, corporation or whatever juristic person it is.

I want to make it clear here that I only occasionally act in the capacity of the legal person MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON. In most situations I am acting in my natural capacity as one of Mother Natures or Gods creations, acting in the tangible physical reality, unfettered by man made fictions and rules. If I travel on public roads or elsewhere, I am doing so as a man, even if I for my own and others safety follow most of the traffic regulations, and even if my car has a DVLA number plate.
If I am doing monetary transaction via the mechanisms within the man made fictions, I am of course acting as my legal person at that moment.

Furthermore, as involuntary servitude is no longer considered a lawful practice, I have the right to be compensated for all I do. This include the work I do for MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON.
To my knowledge I have not agreed to act in the capacity of this legal person, without compensation.  If I have done so in the past, it has been because I was not aware of the nature of myself, me legal person and the man made fictions and how they interact, since I was never informed of this.

Thus I hereby announce that from now on I will not act in this capacity any more, without first having an agreement in place as to how much I need to be paid for the actions I am asked to do. The price for this will vary depending on the task at hand. And since I have not been dealt with honourably in many interactions with various entities within the State, I require to be paid up front, before I will perform. No payment – no duty to perform.

I further assume that on the private side of my legal person there may be an estate that is managed for “my benefit” that has not been disclosed to me, and that there may be considerable wealth accumulated in my name there. I would like to get full disclosure regarding this. Reference the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666.
I am not holding my breath in wait for this to happen, but it should be said and I have now done so. It is my hope that you or someone appropriate will honour this request.

In conclusion

The above should pretty much cover what I can and cannot do as a man or when I act in the capacity of my legal person.

Others that have done similar notices, have often included long lists of things that they consider to be their rights – such as carrying weapons, own or use narcotics, grow, possess or use any herb or natural substance that may be considered illegal within the man made fictions in places, curing oneself with methods or substances that are not allowed to be used by people when they act in the capacity of their legal person, drive without a driving licence or safely exceed speed limits, etc. etc.

I will not do this, as I would probably forget some points, and I also believe that as a man I am free to go about my life and enjoy my property without interference from others, as long as I cause minimal harm to others and act in a responsible and considerate manner.

So for this reason, I require you, the State/Crown and any public or private organization that believes it has the right to regulate what I can and cannot do, to tell me what I as a living Man, and creation of Mother Nature / God, acting outside any man made fictions in the tangible physical reality, cannot do, if I do no, or minimal harm to my fellow man.
Please back your statement by facts that can be easily observed and understood in the tangible reality, away from anything fictional.

If you, or anyone you may forward this to, fails in providing such facts or evidence, you agree that my Natural Rights are whole and complete and are a part of me, that no man or group of men or their invented fictions, has any right to meddle with. You agree that my body is mine and I have the final say in what can be done to it. You further agree that no denial of rights or freedoms can be made to either me as a man or to my legal person as a result of me not wanting to do certain things to my body, such as future vaccination or chip implants.

I am looking forward to your complete and substantial reply to this notice, that will cover all points raised above.  You have 30 days to provide this. If such a reply has not been received by me within 30 days of proof of mailing of this notice, then your silence will be understood as agreement with all that has been stated above.

Sincerely and without ill will.



Autograph:__________________________________________ Date:_______________________
Kent of the Bengtsson family, a living free sovereign man of this Earth. Settlor and main Beneficiary of the legal person / Trust MR KENT ERIK BENGTSSON

_ _ _ _ _

Then after 30 days if you have not had the kind of reply required, send a second a reminder and a copy of this again.  Then a third reminder and then send them a "Notice of Estoppel" that explains that they have not responded in substance to the notice (meaning they have not answered any questions or provided the proof required) and in accordance with the terms presented they have now agreed that the things presented in the notice are correct and true, and that they now have no legal or lawful right to.......(as per what the now agreed notice).

Do all by at least signed for mail, so you have the post office as a witness. Get the label ahead of mailing from the post office, and take one of the small stickers from it and attach it to the notice, and attach the other small label to your own original. That way you have reference numbers for the matter and the post office as a kind of witness. Keep paper copies of everything in a file. Such as the printout from the signed for letters delivery from the PO website, as proof of delivery, etc.  If you will have to use this in a court of law one day, you will look like an absolute fool, if you papers are not in order.
It might be a good idea to have your signing of the notice witnessed by two people who knows you, but are not family.

If you want to be even more thorough, find someone who is willing to be your "mail witness". This person would mail it for you and then sign a paper that s/he did it at so and so time and place, and there would be a stipulation in the notice that all responses will have to be mailed to that mail witness, who again will sign a paper that s/he received it at a certain date, and forwarded it to you.
Now it is not just your word and the Post Office tracking, but a third independent witness that attest to how things have been done. This latter is most likely an overkill.

I suggest you alter this notice to express your understandings in a way that you would say it, and of course add the addressee and sender, etc.  And remove my names, numbers etc. or you will not seem at all competent and will be disregarded.

Will they reply.  Most likely not. Or they will respond that this is some rubbish from the internet and they do not have to respond to things like this. Or the addressee will not respond, but some junior office worker will tell you to piss off. The possibilities are infinite.

If the response is not what you have requested, tell them so and that you regard what they responded with as a non-response, and give them the opportunity to respond properly.

The words in this notice just expresses my understanding and you can and should use what you think is relevant for you. There is no secret formula for how to do or word things.  The people who are pulling the strings in this system are just dreaming up shit themselves. If they can, we can.


Here is the cover letter I have sent to 3 men and women who hold positions of seniority in the UK Government. Note that it is addressed to them in their private capacity and not to the office they hold. As I do not write this as someone who is within their fiction (The UK) but as a living man to another living man.

Again, alter this to say things your way and according to your understanding. Note how I write addresses. The address is again a fiction within the greater fiction called the UK. So one should write it in such a way that one sets oneself as separate from it.  I also boxed in the post code, as that separates it from the rest of the document in a legal sense.



 "Kent of the
Bengtsson family,
a man.
Can be reached via:
My House, My Street,
My Town
[AB12 3CD]


To:  The man Rishi Sunak, acting as: 20 August 2020
Lord Chancellor and
Secretary of State for Justice

c/o Ministry of Justice
102 Petty France
London  [ SW1H 9AJ ]


Re:  Attached Notice, for your information, consideration and response.



Dear Rishi,

Due to what appears to be attempts to set aside or circumvent each man’s, woman’s and child’s God given / Natural rights, that  we all were born with (as can be seen in this ongoing lockdown and the talks of vaccinating the whole population for a disease that seem to have less than a half percent mortality in the general population) I have sent you the enclosed Notice, for you to inspect and respond to.

It states what I understand my rights as a man are, and if anyone does not agree I have these rights, it gives them the opportunity to prove that stance with facts.

I require that you or someone competent that you assign, will take the time to read the notice, and either acknowledge that I am correct in my assumptions, or to point out where I am wrong and how, backed by evidence that clearly show how I am wrong.  No response will be interpreted as silent acquiescence, and agreement with my understandings of how things are.

You have a generous 30 days to respond in substance to the notice – after which, if no such response has been received you agree that my understandings expressed in the notice are correct and that no employees or agents of the UK Government or The Crown, has the right to interfere with those rights or put conditions on them.


Sincerely



Kent of the Bengtsson family, a living man of this Earth."

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(Sorry about the slightly scrambled format of that letter. I can't figure out how to make it right)

Again this is just posted here as a guideline. Anything you send to anyone will be your communication and responsibility, so make sure you only do and say things you fully understand and can respond to if questioned.

Good luck and have fun with it.

Kent